[Bioc-devel] Accepted packages can't find each other and fail build
Hi Sokratis, I added the .BBSoptions file to pcxn when it should have been added to pcxnData. The .BBSoptions file should be put in the package that 'Suggests' (not 'Depends') on the other. In this case it's pcxnData that needs the .BBSoptions. Sorry for the mix up, this has been fixed. The data package should install with today's builds and be clean on the Saturday report. The software package should then install with the Saturday builds and be clean on the Sunday report. Valerie
On 10/26/2017 04:26 AM, Shepherd, Lori wrote:
We have already taken care of this on our end and you shouldn't need to do anything else. As always changes reflected may take a few days to reflect in the build reports. The solution is to add a .BBSoptions file with ForceInstall: TRUE to the software package. Since there is a circular dependency this will force install the software package even though there will be ERRORs because of the missing data package. On the next build of the data packages, the data package will then successfully build finding the software package. Then following, the software package will also build finding the data package. Cheers, Lori Shepherd Bioconductor Core Team Roswell Park Cancer Institute Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Elm & Carlton Streets Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of Sokratis Kariotis <s.kariotis at sheffield.ac.uk><mailto:s.kariotis at sheffield.ac.uk>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 4:02:53 AM
To: bioc-devel
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Accepted packages can't find each other and fail build
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 4:02:53 AM
To: bioc-devel
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Accepted packages can't find each other and fail build
Hey all,
I created 2 packages that got accepted (pcxn and pcxnData) where pcxn
depends on the data coming from pcxnData. However, in the vignettes of
pcxnData I am using library(pcxn) to demonstrate what can you do with the
data. As a result both packages fail building in BioC 3.6 as they can't
find each other. In a previous pair of packages I am maintaining (pathprint
and pathprintGEOData) I could use the first library in the data package
vignette and building was fine. Is it necessary to remove library(pcxn)
from pcxnData to get them build? Thanks in advance!
Cheers
--
Sokratis Kariotis
Scientific Programmer
Hidelab
Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience
385a Glossop Rd, Sheffield, S10 2HQ
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org<mailto:Bioc-devel at r-project.org> mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org<mailto:Bioc-devel at r-project.org> mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.