[Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released package?
On 11/01/2017 11:14 AM, Arman Shahrisa wrote:
Hi, There are two GitHub commits for my package ?cbaf? by Bioconductor on 30 October. The interesting thing is the first commit changes version in description file from 0.99.8 to 1.0.0 while the second one changes 1.0.0 to 1.1.0. Is it correct?
Yes, this is correct. This is part of the release process. What's important do understand here is that between those 2 version bumps we created the RELEASE_3_6 branch so the version of your package that is in the branch is 1.0.0 and is the version that gets released as part of BioC 3.6 The version in master is 1.1.0 and is part of BioC devel which will be released in 6 months as BioC 3.7. Hope this helps, H.
In Bioconductor.org the version of published package is 1.0.0. The same thing has happened for Bioconductor git repository as well (After pulling the changes made by bioc team). Best regards, Arman [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=QULS0llSDUyFo3Zb5ThfvU-dYxMcP7cQh3g8fyVLnDI&s=NuaZmiUZRMLhZCgqcNGl4CLnDogeyO3QDAVCyPsVMTU&e=
Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319