Skip to content
Prev 1271 / 21312 Next

[Bioc-devel] Wiki discussion on classes for Illumina data

Mark Dunning wrote:
I agree this is a good idea.  A unified parser and an
IlluminaExpressionSet makes a good deal of sense to me.  In the short
term, these could go into an IlluminaBase package and, once stable,
could potentially be moved into biobase?

I'm not sure that it is a good idea to rely on a plugin for BeadStudio,
though, to solve the parser problem.  Most users will never use it; in
many cases the users of the data will not even have access to the
software to produce it.  There is, of course, no reason not to make such
a plugin and make it available, but I think it will be difficult to get
everyone to use it before using bioconductor packages.

A little outside the discussion is the fact that Illumina can be used
for methylation, SNP, copy number (a bi-product of snps), and
potentially other uses, so when naming classes and annotation packages,
it might be worth taking this into account.

Sean