[Bioc-devel] R CMD check without WARNING: g++ and STL issue for xcms and mzR
On 04/02/2017 06:52 AM, Neumann, Steffen wrote:
Hi, in preparation for the release, we are hunting down WARNINGS "Found ?abort?, possibly from ?abort? (C)" in xcms/mzR. The abort() call is not coming from XCMS, but rather from the C++ code in the STL, and we have no idea how to get rid of it. We are tracking this in: https://github.com/sneumann/xcms/issues/150 In a nutshell, the standard tenplate library (STL) that comes with g++-5.4.0 has a snippet: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/1cb6c2eb3b8361d850be8e8270c59727 0a1a7967/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/stl_list.h#L1825 ... # 1770 "/usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_list.h" void _M_check_equal_allocators(list& __x) { if (_M_get_Node_allocator()) __builtin_abort(); } You can also check this by looking at the compiler output after the preprocess step: g++ -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -fpic -g -O2 -fstack- protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -c massifquant/TrMgr.cpp -E | less The same applies to mzR, where the same stl_list.h is included in two files (Found ?abort?, possibly from ?abort? (C) Objects: ?./boost/libs/regex/src/instances.o?, ?./boost/libs/regex/src/winstances.o?) => Since we don't want to patch the STL, we have no idea how to fix that WARNING. Is there a way to get an exception, or patch/whitelist this call in R CMD check ?
I don't think Bioconductor can help with this; maybe the Rcpp or R-devel mailing lists? Presumably there is a minimal example that generates the warning? It would be convenient to communicate that (maybe a package as github repo?) rather than the prospect of mzR / xcms installation & debugging. Martin
Yours, Steffen Neumann
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or...{{dropped:2}}