[Bioc-devel] RMassBank build error
On 7 October 2016 21:30, Rainer Johannes wrote:
an update: I've switched back to the "default" initialize methods for Spectrum1 and Spectrum2 objects in MSnbase (not implemented in C) and with these installing RMassBank seems to work. I have however now to run some intense torture tests on MSnbase to ensure that we don't run again into the random memory problems that we had in MSnbase (issue https://github.com/lgatto/MSnbase/issues/138)
I have done the same thing, which also needed addressing some unit tests. I will push these updates to master for after a final package check, but wait for the results of your intense torture tests before committing to svn. Laurent
jo
On 7 Oct 2016, at 20:14, Rainer Johannes <Johannes.Rainer at eurac.edu> wrote: we could try to switch back from the C-constructors to the "old" ones, I'll check later
On 7 Oct 2016, at 20:03, Schymanski, Emma <Emma.Schymanski at eawag.ch> wrote: Hi Laurent, I don't have an answer for you right now - but in CC are also the other 3 involved in trying to fix this on our side... Just to make sure that all have the respective email addresses to try speed up the debugging... Thanks! Emma
________________________________________
From: Laurent Gatto [lg390 at cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, 7 October 2016 7:52 PM
To: Schymanski, Emma; Martin Morgan
Cc: bioc-devel at r-project.org; Rainer Johannes
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] RMassBank build error
Dear Emma,
The error is very strange indeed, and I hope Martin can help us out here.
With the latest RMassBank and MSnbase, I get
new("RmbSpectrum2")
Error in initialize(value, ...) :
'initialize' method returned an object of class ?Spectrum2? instead of
the required class ?RmbSpectrum2?
which reproduces the error.
The RmbSpectrum2 class is defined in a standard way
.RmbSpectrum2 <- setClass("RmbSpectrum2",
representation = representation(
satellite="logical",
low="logical",
rawOK ="logical",
good = "logical",
mzCalc = "numeric",
formula = "character",
dbe = "numeric",
formulaCount = "integer",
dppm = "numeric",
dppmBest = "numeric",
ok = "logical",
info = "list"
),
contains=c("Spectrum2"),
prototype = prototype(
satellite = logical(),
low = logical(),
rawOK = logical(),
good = logical(),
mzCalc = numeric(),
formula = character(),
dbe = numeric(),
formulaCount = integer(),
dppm = numeric(),
dppmBest = numeric(),
ok = logical(),
info = list(),
new("Versioned", versions=c(classVersion("Spectrum2"),
RmbSpectrum2 = "0.1.0"))
))
and
new("Spectrum2")
Object of class "Spectrum2"
Precursor: NA
Retention time: :
Charge: NA
MSn level: 2
Peaks count: 0
Total ion count: 0
works.
The MSnbase maintainers have had a bit of a struggle with spurious and
stange failures in the recent past (see [1]). This ans a whole new
backend in the package have led to the following initialize method, that
constructs the class directly in C
setMethod("initialize",
"Spectrum2",
function(.Object, msLevel = 2L, peaksCount = length(mz),
rt = numeric(), acquisitionNum = NA_integer_,
scanIndex = integer(), tic = 0L, mz = numeric(),
intensity = numeric(), fromFile = numeric(),
centroided = NA, smoothed = NA,
polarity = NA_integer_, merged = 1,
precScanNum = NA_integer_, precursorMz = NA,
precursorIntensity = NA, precursorCharge = NA_integer_,
collisionEnergy = NA) {
.Object <- Spectrum2_mz_sorted(msLevel, peaksCount, rt,
acquisitionNum, scanIndex,
tic, mz, intensity, fromFile,
centroided, smoothed, polarity,
merged, precScanNum, precursorMz,
precursorIntensity, precursorCharge,
collisionEnergy)
if (validObject(.Object))
.Object
})
Why is calling new("RmbSpectrum2") direclty returning an Spectrum2
object? Is this due to us not calling callNextMethod?
Laurent
[1] https://github.com/lgatto/MSnbase/issues/138
On 7 October 2016 17:02, Schymanski, Emma wrote:
Hi BioC team,
In all the mzR troubles, it slipped through that RMassBank had a build error of it's own presumably caused by an update to MSnbase - for some reason we never received the email with the build error reports?!
We have discovered the error now, very late, and are onto finding out the cause to fix it but it is not straightforward. Now that it is the day of the deadline to pass build without error, are we able to have a little leeway if needed? It's taken us the whole day to get the right binaries to actually have a chance to start fixing...
Can someone also check or explain why we no longer receive the emails reporting errors to us?
Thanks,
Emma (on behalf of the others)
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
--
Laurent Gatto | @lgatt0
http://cpu.sysbiol.cam.ac.uk/
http://lgatto.github.io/
Laurent Gatto | @lgatt0 http://cpu.sysbiol.cam.ac.uk/ http://lgatto.github.io/