[Bioc-devel] role of replaceSlots in BiocGenerics
One of the reasons it's not exported is because it started as something kind of experimental and we didn't find a good home for it yet. I could probably move it to S4Vectors where we already have some low-level S4-related utils. Not the best home either but maybe better than in BiocGenerics? IMO using something like replaceSlots() or initialize() is still better than using direct slot assignment when you need to replace more than 1 slot. It's more compact and provide an all-slots-are-modified-at-once semantic (atomicity) which can be useful if modifying the slots one after the other could temporarily create an invalid object. H.
On 09/06/2017 03:41 PM, Vincent Carey wrote:
I am getting complaints from CMD check about ::: which seems necessary to
use this replaceSlots facility because it is not exported. I will look
into initialize,
which might work fine for my concern. I cannot remember why I did not just
use direct assignment to slots, however. Perhaps I just found the
function and
decided using it would be better. It would be nice to export replaceSlots
if it does not contravene an important principle.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org
<mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote:
Hi,
Personally I like replaceSlots() better.
Not only because it's more readable but also the fact that you can use
initialize() to update an existing object is an undocumented feature so
I prefer to not rely on it.
Also initialize() is a generic and there could be a method defined for
the object you're trying to update that won't behave the way you expect
(e.g. the names of its arguments won't necessarily match the names of
the slots).
Also validation can be expensive and there are many situations where
you know that you're replacing the object slots with thiings that
don't break the object so I like that I can call replaceSlots() with
check=FALSE.
I actually wish the methods package had something like replaceSlots().
H.
On 09/06/2017 01:11 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
No, the best practice is to just use initialize(). It used to be
that
replaceSlots() saved some copying, but that's no longer really the
case. The only potential benefit is that it can skip validity
checks,
but usually you want those.
Michael
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Vincent Carey
<stvjc at channing.harvard.edu <mailto:stvjc at channing.harvard.edu>>
wrote:
Is this the preferred way of adjusting content in a
live object? It is not accessible except via ":::"
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org <mailto:Bioc-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=iXa2JnAchBDp8QpTOD4yZHTEXOMu5gjBfDOMcvQCriU&s=0Rbio7Sp7SXzPgU4xGDGkWA7V-tkgkDizVkI9JMYQ2g&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=iXa2JnAchBDp8QpTOD4yZHTEXOMu5gjBfDOMcvQCriU&s=0Rbio7Sp7SXzPgU4xGDGkWA7V-tkgkDizVkI9JMYQ2g&e=>
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org <mailto:Bioc-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=iXa2JnAchBDp8QpTOD4yZHTEXOMu5gjBfDOMcvQCriU&s=0Rbio7Sp7SXzPgU4xGDGkWA7V-tkgkDizVkI9JMYQ2g&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=iXa2JnAchBDp8QpTOD4yZHTEXOMu5gjBfDOMcvQCriU&s=0Rbio7Sp7SXzPgU4xGDGkWA7V-tkgkDizVkI9JMYQ2g&e=>
--
Herv? Pag?s
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>
Phone: (206) 667-5791 <tel:%28206%29%20667-5791>
Fax: (206) 667-1319 <tel:%28206%29%20667-1319>
Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319