Skip to content
Prev 469 / 21312 Next

[Bioc-devel] Biobase / eSet changes for this release

Martin,

Sorry for taking so long in responding.

We seem to be almost there but I have two concerns:

1) SNPset as it is will not be useful. As far as I know only Rob and me 
are  developing software that will use snpSet. Both of us need a slot 
for copynumber. Otherwise we will need to create a new class, which will 
be the only one used, and we wont get to use the name SnpSet.

2) It seems that in general we will be storing  an esimate (expression, 
calls, copynumber) and some kind of measure of uncertainty (SE for 
expression, p-value fo calls, etc..). However, a big chunk fo the apps 
will not use uncertainty. It would be a shame to have to store a matrix 
of NAs every single time. How hard would be to have eSet take NULL for 
some matrices? The validity check can look at everything that is not NULL.
Notice that the alternative is to define  a new class which means, in my 
case, Ill need two classes for every class Im defining or having a 
matrix of NAs, which, given the size of data these days, will be very 
inneficient.

im cc-ing ingo and rob who maintain SNPscan.

-r
Martin Morgan wrote: