Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602021410590.4604@enigma.biostat.jhsph.edu>
Date: 2006-02-02T19:12:38Z
From: Rafael A. Irizarry
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Biobase eSet and exprSet validation
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0602021046250.3328@capecod.bwh.harvard.edu>
i agree that we should get rid of exprSet. the oligo package uses the eSet
exclusiveley. but we need to be very careful not lose functionailty, for
example, i know that exprs<- does not exist for eSet. i suspect this
method is used in various places
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Vincent Carey 525-2265 wrote:
>>
>> Now might also be a good time to replace any use of the deprecated
>> eset data with the new sample.eSet and sample.exprSet data sets.
>
> how about converting all serialized exprSets to eSets? there is an "as" operator
> to help with this in Biobase...
>
> should we try to eliminate all reliance on exprSets? it can only be
> confusing to newcomers that there are two basic containers
> doing the same thing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>