Skip to content
Back to formatted view

Raw Message

Message-ID: <CAMFmJskJ_5AAyoph-AuXzBAwECukDi6zXbPMsgU11nqY5LZV5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2017-11-01T20:42:23Z
From: Gabriel Becker
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Confusion with how to maintain release/devel files on local computer.
In-Reply-To: <AM3PR05MB13005368A671E2481D25FE8E8B5F0@AM3PR05MB1300.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

Arman,

Not on the Bioc team per se, but I would say only have a checkout of the
release branch when you need it, ie a bug is reported, you have fixed it in
devel, and you are ready to push the very narrow bugfix to release. I only
keep "master" checkouts of my packages on a permanent basis.

You generally shouldn't need a checkout of release, imho, because no
development should be happening there with exception of the case above.

Hope that helps,
~G

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Arman Shahrisa <shahrisa.arman at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> I?m confused with development process.
>
> At first, I need to have a folder with accepted packaged. Then I need to
> pull
> origion RELEASE_3_6?
>
> Then in another folder, I need to pull origion master?
>
> So that by opening each folder, I know what I?m editing.
> Also during push, I need to be careful about where I?m pushing changes.
> Origion is bioc?s git address of my package whereas master is the package
> directory in GitHub?
>
> Am I getting it correct?
> Is there anywhere that contains whole the process and codes in steps?
>
> Best regards,
> Arman
>
>
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>



-- 
Gabriel Becker, Ph.D
Scientist
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Genentech Research

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]