[Bioc-devel] sma package moved to archived status (was Re: [BioC] failure to install: aCGH depends on unavailable package)
Hi Vince, my two cents...: a long term commitment to maintaining sma might end up creating more work than the short term pain of moving the useful bits to MLInterfaces, Biobase or limma? Best wishes Wolfgang
nt Carey wrote:
MLInterfaces used sma::stat.diag.da As the package was GPL2 I believe I can just move the relevant sources to MLInterfaces for now; will include attribution in the man page. However, the package does not seem to be too far from being checkable with R 2.10, so perhaps biocore can take on the maintenance, and just distribute via Bioconductor. I would volunteer to do the first set of patches to get it past check, if we want to go that route. On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Patrick Aboyoun <paboyoun at fhcrc.org> wrote:
I've been informed by Ben Bolstad (package maintainer) that sma has been retired/archived and so BioC developers will need to remove dependency on sma for BioC 2.5. The following 6 packages will be directly affected: aCGH, BiocCaseStudies, GeneSelector, limma, limmaGUI, MLInterfaces For those looking for alternatives for particular functionality, we can open up a discussion on the BioC-devel mailing list. Cheers, Patrick Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear Patrick, Thanks a lot! Best, R. On Friday 25 September 2009 19:10:03 Patrick Aboyoun wrote:
Ramon, I am not sure what happened to the sma package on CRAN. It must have been removed from the repository over the past week since our build system had fresh installations last week and sma was still available. I e-mailed the package author and CRAN maintainer to find out why this change happened. I'll e-mail back my findings and what if any actions we in BioC will have to take. Patrick Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear All,
I just noticed (failures installing a bunch of BioC packages in new R
installations) that aCGH depends on "sma", but sma is no longer
available. Thus, the recommended procedure
source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R")
biocLite("aCGH")
will fail. And any package which depends on aCGH (e.g., snapCGH) will
fail to install too.
I guess this is a bug in sma but, if I understand correctly, it should
not be possible for a package to fail the standard installation
procedure
for the stable release?
Best,
R.
P.D. sma used to be available in CRAN, so it is possible to get an old
version from
http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/sma/
install that, and then install aCGH.
### this is one example; it fails on at least two other different
systems
too.
version
_ platform x86_64-pc-linux-gnu arch x86_64 os linux-gnu system x86_64, linux-gnu status major 2 minor 9.2 year 2009 month 08 day 24 svn rev 49384 language R version.string R version 2.9.2 (2009-08-24) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Best wishes
Wolfgang
-------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Huber
EMBL
http://www.embl.de/research/units/genome_biology/huber