Skip to content
Prev 14046 / 21318 Next

[Bioc-devel] Package update failure because of version numbering

On 09/18/2018 07:03 AM, Holger Schwender wrote:
If the package has been publicly available outside Bioconductor at 
version 2.1.9 then I think you really want to always increment 'up', so 
something larger than that, such as 2.1.10. This will become 2.2.0 in 
the next release.

To get the 2.0.0 version, one would make the (allowed) change 1.99.0 and 
then increment z. This will be bumped to 2.0.0 at release. This would be 
appropriate only if version numbers less than 1.99.0 have been used already.

A good practice for local changes in this scenario might be to increment 
a final 'w' 1.51.2.1 1.51.2.2 etc version before committing 1.51.3 to 
Bioconductor.

If you'd like to increment your Bioconductor package to 2.1.10, please 
let me know and I'll make the change; you can then pull the update to 
your local repository.

Martin