[Bioc-devel] Confusing namespace issue with IRanges 1.99.17
On 7/8/14 12:27 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:
On 07/08/2014 11:58 AM, Leonardo Collado Torres wrote:
Hello, Thank you everyone for the replies and help! I did not know that it was due to S4Vectors::extractROWS nor what Herv? exposed about the upcoming changes to them. Regarding "probably it is not desirable to move packages from loaded to attached, but I don't think this influences performance in a meaningful way?", I think that it doesn't. I was just surprised to see the change since I thought that I was correctly specifying the namespace. As for "But what's with needing to load IRanges to subset an Rle? Is that temporary?", the real use case is the function fstats.apply() located here https://github.com/lcolladotor/derfinderHelper/blob/master/R/fstats.apply.R It basically takes as input a DataFrame where each column is a coverage Rle and calculates some statistics with it. The function has three methods implemented: one in Rle world that is slow with large samples data sets, another one that involves coercion to a regular matrix object and a third one that involves coercing to a Matrix::sparseMatrix object this is faster and less memory intensive. It is for this last one that I use the mapply() call (see https://github.com/lcolladotor/derfinderHelper/blob/master/R/fstats.apply.R#L184 ). I guess that .transformSparseMatrix() could probably be made more efficient but I haven't explored how to do so any further. Going back to the namespace, I thought that it was considered a best practice to just import the functions/methods needed. That's why I try to have specific imports (using roxygen2). For instance, for fstats.apply() I use the following roxygen2 tags: #' @importFrom S4Vectors Rle #' @importMethodsFrom S4Vectors as.numeric #' @importMethodsFrom IRanges as.data.frame as.matrix Reduce ncol nrow which '[' #' @importFrom Matrix sparseMatrix #' @importMethodsFrom Matrix '%*%' drop I can see in some BioC packages the namespace uses specific imports and others where they import the full package.
Honestly I don't know why so many BioC packages do that. But it seems to be a strong trend. IMHO it's a lot of work for very little benefits. Doesn't seem to make a big difference from a loading time perspective. However it makes the NAMESPACE big and adds some unnecessary overhead to the overall maintainability of the package. For example, when some low-level functionality moves from one package to the other (like it happened recently with the Rle class), then all the BioC packages that selectively import stuff from IRanges need to have their NAMESPACE fixed. I've heard some people claiming they do it to minimize the risk of a name collision. Fair enough. But name collisions are pretty rare. A simple and straightforward approach is to import full packages until a name collision issue actually happens. For most packages, it will never happen. But if it happens, you'll get a warning at both: installation- and load-time, so you can't miss it. Then you can adjust the NAMESPACE by selectively importing from one of the 2 packages involved in the collision.
I thought selective imports were considered "best practice" as well. I seem to remember an email from Martin on this list a while ago saying just that. So perhaps that is why everyone is doing it? As in many things, perhaps the middle road is the best practice? If you are using only one or two functions from a package, importFrom makes a lot more sense. But if you are using multiple classes and methods from a package, or if you have to start importing things like '[', then it is more straightforward to import the entire package. Stephanie
The selective imports is sometimes pushed to the extreme: I've seen BioC packages trying to selectively import stuff from the methods package! There is probably zero benefit in doing this, only maintenance complications in the long run... Also I think I remember reading somewhere (R-devel list? R official doc? Can't remember exactly) that packages are not supposed to do that. My 2 cents. I'm sure not everybody will agree with this. H.
Should I stop doing so and just import the full packages? That is: #' @import IRanges Matrix S4Vectors It would go from around 4 secs to around 6 secs to load the tiny package. In my use case, I shipped fstats.apply() to a tiny package containing just the function for using a Snow-based BiocParallel::blapply(). The original package would take too long to load (around 40 secs, it used to import a total of 18 packages) and this has a very large impact compared to used a multicore-based blapply(). However, the Snow-based version uses significantly less memory. Thank you, Leo On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fhcrc.org> wrote:
Hi guys, On 07/08/2014 05:29 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
This is why I tell people not to use require(). But what's with needing to load IRanges to subset an Rle? Is that temporary?
Very temporary. The source code of the "extractROWS" and "replaceROWS"
methods for Rle objects actually contains the following comment:
## FIXME: Right now, the subscript 'i' is turned into an IRanges
## object so we need stuff that lives in the IRanges package for this
## to work. This is ugly/hacky and needs to be fixed (thru a redesign
## of this method).
if (!suppressWarnings(require(IRanges, quietly=TRUE)))
stop(...)
...
I introduced this hack last week when I moved the Rle code from IRanges
to S4Vectors. It's temporary. The 2 methods need to be refactored which
I'm planning to do this week.
Cheers,
H.
Limiting imports is unlikely to reduce loading time. It may actually increase it. There are good reasons for it though. On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Martin Morgan <mtmorgan at fhcrc.org> wrote:
Hi Leonardo -- On 07/07/2014 03:27 PM, Leonardo Collado Torres wrote:
Hello BioC-devel list,
I am currently confused on a namespace issue which I haven't been
able
to solve. To reproduce this, I made the simplest example I thought
of.
Step 1: make some toy data and save it on your desktop
library(IRanges)
DF <- DataFrame(x = Rle(0, 10), y = Rle(1, 10))
save(DF, file="~/Desktop/DF.Rdata")
Step 2: install the toy package on R 3.1.x
library(devtools)
install_github("lcolladotor/fooPkg")
# Note that it passes R CMD check
Step 3: on a new R session run
example("foo", "fooPkg")
# Change the location of DF.Rdata if necessary
You will see that when running the example, the session
information is
printed listing:
other attached packages:
[1] fooPkg_0.0.1
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] BiocGenerics_0.11.3 IRanges_1.99.17 parallel_3.1.0
S4Vectors_0.1.0 stats4_3.1.0 tools_3.1.0
Then the message for loading IRanges is showed, which is something I
was not expecting and thus the following session info shows:
other attached packages:
[1] IRanges_1.99.17 S4Vectors_0.1.0 BiocGenerics_0.11.3
fooPkg_0.0.1
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] stats4_3.1.0 tools_3.1.0
Meaning that IRanges, S4Vectors and BiocGenerics all went from
"loaded
via a namespace" to "other attached packages".
All the fooPkg::foo() is doing is using a mapply() to go through a
DataFrame and a list of indices to subset the data as shown at
https://github.com/lcolladotor/fooPkg/blob/master/R/foo.R#L26 That
is:
res <- mapply(function(x, y) { x[y] }, DF, index)
I thus thought that the only thing I would need to specify on the
namespace is to import the '[' IRanges method.
Checking with BiocCheck and codetoolsBioC suggests importing the
method for mapply() from BiocGenerics. Doing so doesn't affect things
and R still loads IRanges on that mapply() call. Importing the '['
method from S4Vectors doesn't help either. Most intriging, importing
the whole S4Vectors, BiocGenerics and IRanges still doesn't change
the
fact that IRanges is loaded when evaluating the same line of code
shown above.
Any clues on what I am missing or doing wrong?
This comes from S4Vectors::extractROWS
selectMethod(extractROWS, c("Rle", "integer"))
Method Definition:
function (x, i)
{
if (!suppressWarnings(require(IRanges, quietly = TRUE)))
stop("Couldn't load the IRanges package. You need to
install ",
"the IRanges\n package in order to subset an Rle
object.")
...
which moves the IRanges package from loaded to attached. Maybe that
should
be 'suppressPackageStartupMessages' or if (!IRanges %in%
loadedNamespaces()) and functions referenced by IRanges:::...
In my use case, I'm trying to keep the namespace as small as possible (to minimize loading time) because it's for a tiny package that has a single function. This tiny package is then loaded on a BiocParallel::blapply() call using BiocParallel::SnowParam() which performs much better than BiocParallel::MulticoreParam() in terms of keeping the memory under control.
probably it is not desirable to move packages from loaded to attached, but I don't think this influences performance in a meaningful way? Martin
Thank you for your help! Leo Leonardo Collado Torres, PhD student Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Website: http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~lcollado/ Blog: http://lcolladotor.github.io/ Full output from running the example: example("foo", "fooPkg")
foo> ## Initial info
foo> sessionInfo()
R version 3.1.0 (2014-04-10)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit)
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] fooPkg_0.0.1
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] BiocGenerics_0.11.3 IRanges_1.99.17 parallel_3.1.0
S4Vectors_0.1.0 stats4_3.1.0 tools_3.1.0
foo> ## Load data
foo> load("~/Desktop/DF.Rdata")
foo> ## Run function
foo> result <- foo(DF)
R version 3.1.0 (2014-04-10)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit)
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] fooPkg_0.0.1
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] BiocGenerics_0.11.3 IRanges_1.99.17 parallel_3.1.0
S4Vectors_0.1.0 stats4_3.1.0 tools_3.1.0
Loading required package: parallel
Attaching package: ???BiocGenerics???
The following objects are masked from ???package:parallel???:
clusterApply, clusterApplyLB, clusterCall, clusterEvalQ,
clusterExport, clusterMap, parApply, parCapply, parLapply,
parLapplyLB, parRapply, parSapply, parSapplyLB
The following object is masked from ???package:stats???:
xtabs
The following objects are masked from ???package:base???:
anyDuplicated, append, as.data.frame, as.vector, cbind,
colnames,
do.call, duplicated, eval, evalq, Filter, Find, get,
intersect, is.unsorted, lapply, Map, mapply, match, mget,
order,
paste, pmax, pmax.int, pmin, pmin.int, Position, rank,
rbind, Reduce, rep.int, rownames, sapply, setdiff, sort,
table,
tapply, union, unique, unlist
R version 3.1.0 (2014-04-10)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit)
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets
methods base
other attached packages:
[1] IRanges_1.99.17 S4Vectors_0.1.0 BiocGenerics_0.11.3
fooPkg_0.0.1
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] stats4_3.1.0 tools_3.1.0
The same thing happens with the following setup:
R version 3.1.1 RC (2014-07-07 r66083)
Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
locale:
[1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
[3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
[5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
[7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
[9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
[11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] parallel stats graphics grDevices datasets utils
methods
[8] base
other attached packages:
[1] IRanges_1.99.17 S4Vectors_0.1.0 BiocGenerics_0.11.3
[4] fooPkg_0.0.1 colorout_1.0-2
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] stats4_3.1.1 tools_3.1.1
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
-- Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 Location: Arnold Building M1 B861 Phone: (206) 667-2793
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
-- Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fhcrc.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319