Message-ID: <assp.2016dfb3b1.1469620942.1792.116.camel@ipb-halle.de>
Date: 2016-07-27T12:02:22Z
From: Neumann, Steffen
Subject: [Bioc-devel] bioconductor/metabolomics Docker image available
In-Reply-To: <1054120297.146312.1446048146551.JavaMail.zimbra@fredhutch.org>
Hi Dan and BioC community!
I now cleaned up my?Bioconductor/bioc_docker?
and opened a pull request to add a Metabolomics?
Bioconductor [1].
This works on our Jenkins installation, where I regularly?
build the devel_metabolomics [2] and release [3] images.
The image for the previous devel version (BioC-3.3) does build,?
but the image for the old release version (BioC-3.2) does not,?
due to the mzR issue on new gcc we talked about a few months ago.
If you want, I can send a second pull request?
and modify?bioc_docker/config.yml to use the current?
versions 3.3 for release, and 3.4 for devel.
A more general question, what is the current docker strategy?
for Bioconductor. Are they build/tested on a regular basis ?
Are failure reported to package maintainers, or should they ??
Should the docker images be part of the regular checkResults report ?
Yours,?
Steffen
[1]?https://github.com/Bioconductor/bioc_docker/pull/4
[2] http://phenomenal-h2020.eu/jenkins/job/bioc_docker_devel_metabolomics/
[3]?http://phenomenal-h2020.eu/jenkins/job/bioc_docker_release_metabolomics
--
IPB Halle????????????????????AG Massenspektrometrie & Bioinformatik
Dr. Steffen Neumann??????????http://www.IPB-Halle.DE
Weinberg 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Tel. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1470
06120 Halle ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? +49 (0) 345 5582 - 0 ? ? ? ? ??
sneumann(at)IPB-Halle.DE?????Fax. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1409