Seem broken in release. And btw., because it is broken, when I run BiocManager::valid() it doesn't report GenomicFeatures as out of date, despite the fact that I have version 1.33.2 installed, and there are newer versions in the 1.33.x hierarchy and the "right" (but broken) version in Bioc 3.8 is 1.34.0. Best, Kasper
[Bioc-devel] GenomicFeatures
6 messages · Martin Morgan, Kasper Daniel Hansen, Obenchain, Valerie +1 more
Thanks Kasper. I'm looking into the error in GenomicFeatures. Martin or Marcel may have more to add but I think BiocManager::install() can only report what versions are in the repo. GenomicFeatures 1.34.0 has not built so doesn't yet exist in the repo. We archive all versions in release but not in devel. The older 1.33.x versions don't exist in "released" Bioconductor 3.8. Valerie
On 11/2/18 6:05 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
Seem broken in release. And btw., because it is broken, when I run BiocManager::valid() it doesn't report GenomicFeatures as out of date, despite the fact that I have version 1.33.2 installed, and there are newer versions in the 1.33.x hierarchy and the "right" (but broken) version in Bioc 3.8 is 1.34.0. Best, Kasper [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
For which BiocManager::version() is this? BiocManager::valid() checks within versions, and if there's no GenomicFeatures to reference, then there is no way to flag it as out-of-date, sort of like a package you'd installed that was in neither CRAN nor Bioconductor.
Though of course we'd like GenomicFeatures to be available in 3.8
Martin
?On 11/2/18, 1:05 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Kasper Daniel Hansen" <bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com> wrote:
Seem broken in release.
And btw., because it is broken, when I run
BiocManager::valid()
it doesn't report GenomicFeatures as out of date, despite the fact that I
have version 1.33.2 installed, and there are newer versions in the 1.33.x
hierarchy and the "right" (but broken) version in Bioc 3.8 is 1.34.0.
Best,
Kasper
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Lates BiocManager It is not flagging GenomicFeatures as out of date, presumably because it doesn't exists in the repos. So in some sense it is all internally consistent. I was just surprised to not see it flagged as being out of date. I guess I am also confused about what happens at release. Is the repos wiped? Because at some time pre-release GenomicFeatures existed in the Bioc 3.8 repos, and (usually) that would mean it would fall back to this previous version (seemingly 1.33.6 based on https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GenomicFeatures.html yet this package does not seem to exists (despite the URL)). Ok, this is all a rather unfortunate and special case which I am not sure how should be handled. I was just surprised at what I am seeing, but I am also quite confident that when the package is fixed, it'll all work fine. Best, Kasper On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:05 AM Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc at gmail.com> wrote:
For which BiocManager::version() is this? BiocManager::valid() checks
within versions, and if there's no GenomicFeatures to reference, then there
is no way to flag it as out-of-date, sort of like a package you'd installed
that was in neither CRAN nor Bioconductor.
Though of course we'd like GenomicFeatures to be available in 3.8
Martin
?On 11/2/18, 1:05 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Kasper Daniel Hansen" <
bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com>
wrote:
Seem broken in release.
And btw., because it is broken, when I run
BiocManager::valid()
it doesn't report GenomicFeatures as out of date, despite the fact
that I
have version 1.33.2 installed, and there are newer versions in the
1.33.x
hierarchy and the "right" (but broken) version in Bioc 3.8 is 1.34.0.
Best,
Kasper
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Historically we used to flush the repos before a release. At some point we stopped and I could not remember why. The situation you describe below is probably it. When preparing for 3.8, we ran into the case where we had quite a few stale packages in the repos. Their 'staleness' was due to being renamed, deprecated, etc. These left around old landing pages and appeared in biocViews inappropriately. At the time it seemed like a good idea to flush the repo (release only) for a clean start. This would result in no products (landing page, tarball, ...) for packages that did not build in the new release. (We also had a hiccup with generating landing pages with stale links that we're working on. Should be fixed soon.) While no landing page / nonavailability is motivation for maintainers to fix broken packages it's also an inconvenience for users and this is not good. For the next release we'll probably do some combination of the two - flush only packages not in the manifest. Sorry for this inconvenience - my fault entirely. Valerie PS/BTW I've fixed GenomicFeatures and if it doesn't have an internet burp during the builds it should be available tomorrow.
On 11/2/18 8:36 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
Lates BiocManager It is not flagging GenomicFeatures as out of date, presumably because it doesn't exists in the repos. So in some sense it is all internally consistent. I was just surprised to not see it flagged as being out of date. I guess I am also confused about what happens at release. Is the repos wiped? Because at some time pre-release GenomicFeatures existed in the Bioc 3.8 repos, and (usually) that would mean it would fall back to this previous version (seemingly 1.33.6 based on https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GenomicFeatures.html yet this package does not seem to exists (despite the URL)). Ok, this is all a rather unfortunate and special case which I am not sure how should be handled. I was just surprised at what I am seeing, but I am also quite confident that when the package is fixed, it'll all work fine. Best, Kasper On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:05 AM Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc at gmail.com> wrote:
For which BiocManager::version() is this? BiocManager::valid() checks
within versions, and if there's no GenomicFeatures to reference, then there
is no way to flag it as out-of-date, sort of like a package you'd installed
that was in neither CRAN nor Bioconductor.
Though of course we'd like GenomicFeatures to be available in 3.8
Martin
?On 11/2/18, 1:05 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Kasper Daniel Hansen" <
bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com>
wrote:
Seem broken in release.
And btw., because it is broken, when I run
BiocManager::valid()
it doesn't report GenomicFeatures as out of date, despite the fact
that I
have version 1.33.2 installed, and there are newer versions in the
1.33.x
hierarchy and the "right" (but broken) version in Bioc 3.8 is 1.34.0.
Best,
Kasper
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
FYI I've temporarily disabled the makeTxDbFromBiomart() examples in GenomicFeatures that have been responsible for this 'R CMD check' TIMEOUT for 2-3 days in a row: https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.8/bioc-LATEST/GenomicFeatures/malbec1-checksrc.html Hopefully GenomicFeatures will pass CHECK on Linux tomorrow (it does on my laptop) and become available. Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience. H.
On 11/2/18 09:15, Obenchain, Valerie wrote:
Historically we used to flush the repos before a release. At some point we stopped and I could not remember why. The situation you describe below is probably it. When preparing for 3.8, we ran into the case where we had quite a few stale packages in the repos. Their 'staleness' was due to being renamed, deprecated, etc. These left around old landing pages and appeared in biocViews inappropriately. At the time it seemed like a good idea to flush the repo (release only) for a clean start. This would result in no products (landing page, tarball, ...) for packages that did not build in the new release. (We also had a hiccup with generating landing pages with stale links that we're working on. Should be fixed soon.) While no landing page / nonavailability is motivation for maintainers to fix broken packages it's also an inconvenience for users and this is not good. For the next release we'll probably do some combination of the two - flush only packages not in the manifest. Sorry for this inconvenience - my fault entirely. Valerie PS/BTW I've fixed GenomicFeatures and if it doesn't have an internet burp during the builds it should be available tomorrow. On 11/2/18 8:36 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
Lates BiocManager
It is not flagging GenomicFeatures as out of date, presumably because it
doesn't exists in the repos. So in some sense it is all internally
consistent. I was just surprised to not see it flagged as being out of
date.
I guess I am also confused about what happens at release. Is the repos
wiped? Because at some time pre-release GenomicFeatures existed in the
Bioc 3.8 repos, and (usually) that would mean it would fall back to this
previous version (seemingly 1.33.6 based on
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bioconductor.org_packages_release_bioc_html_GenomicFeatures.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=FmT-0xoyyS7SkXohUPZa3dftKzXkcDp0GhY-NytdV3Y&s=sl7JqHUHipgtjNOGSG-V5ILOiVoxXzIToIKGZKfOHRw&e=
yet this package does not seem to exists (despite the URL)).
Ok, this is all a rather unfortunate and special case which I am not sure
how should be handled. I was just surprised at what I am seeing, but I am
also quite confident that when the package is fixed, it'll all work fine.
Best,
Kasper
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:05 AM Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc at gmail.com>
wrote:
For which BiocManager::version() is this? BiocManager::valid() checks
within versions, and if there's no GenomicFeatures to reference, then there
is no way to flag it as out-of-date, sort of like a package you'd installed
that was in neither CRAN nor Bioconductor.
Though of course we'd like GenomicFeatures to be available in 3.8
Martin
?On 11/2/18, 1:05 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Kasper Daniel Hansen" <
bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com>
wrote:
Seem broken in release.
And btw., because it is broken, when I run
BiocManager::valid()
it doesn't report GenomicFeatures as out of date, despite the fact
that I
have version 1.33.2 installed, and there are newer versions in the
1.33.x
hierarchy and the "right" (but broken) version in Bioc 3.8 is 1.34.0.
Best,
Kasper
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=FmT-0xoyyS7SkXohUPZa3dftKzXkcDp0GhY-NytdV3Y&s=MBsI-xXM9KdhmmZQBexjPWmCtH1aeHPs6EPc03rVALI&e=
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=FmT-0xoyyS7SkXohUPZa3dftKzXkcDp0GhY-NytdV3Y&s=MBsI-xXM9KdhmmZQBexjPWmCtH1aeHPs6EPc03rVALI&e=
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=FmT-0xoyyS7SkXohUPZa3dftKzXkcDp0GhY-NytdV3Y&s=MBsI-xXM9KdhmmZQBexjPWmCtH1aeHPs6EPc03rVALI&e=
Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319