library("curatedOvarianData")
data(TCGA_eset)
clinical <- pData(TCGA_eset)[, 1:20]
alive <- clinical[clinical[, "vital_status"] == "living", ]
head(alive[, c("days_to_death", "vital_status", "days_to_tumor_recurrence")])
days_to_death vital_status days_to_tumor_recurrence
TCGA.20.0990 789 living 870
TCGA.23.1118 2616 living 2616
TCGA.23.1026 816 living 797
TCGA.20.0991 797 living 797
TCGA.23.1119 3953 living 3378
TCGA.23.1028 1503 living 133
I thought days_to_death would be NA for living samples. The first sample has a recurrence time larger than the days to death. I realise that days_to_death can also contain time to last follow-up, but then why isn't it the same as days_to_tumor_recurrence, for the first sample ?
--------------------------------------
Dario Strbenac
PhD Student
University of Sydney
Camperdown NSW 2050
Australia
[Bioc-devel] Contradictory Clinical Data in curatedOvarianData
2 messages · Dario Strbenac, Topsoil Wang
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/attachments/20140520/7253fb71/attachment.pl>