Skip to content

[Bioc-devel] DOI for packages

4 messages · Shepherd, Lori, Laurent Gatto, Martin Morgan

#
Hello Bioconductor,

We have added DOI's for packages on Bioconductor package landing pages. The DOI will get generated automatically when a package is accepted to Bioconductor. This is the recommended reference to use for publication/citations/etc.  The DOI link should automatically redirect to the current release version of a package (or devel if the package is not yet in release).


Thank you,



Lori Shepherd

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263


This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
#
On 19 October 2017 13:22, Shepherd, Lori wrote:

            
Thank you for this.

Are there any plans to add the DOI to the DESCRIPTION file and
automatically include it to the default citation() output?

Laurent

  
    
#
Many Thanks to Sean Davis for coming up with how to generate and providing the infastructure!


Lori Shepherd

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263
#
On 10/19/2017 03:10 PM, Laurent Gatto wrote:
This first part of this came up before. Any field can be added to the 
DESCRIPTION file so one could add DOI:..., but since they are easily 
generated by paste0("https://doi.org/doi:10.18129/B9.bioc.", 
<package_name>) there seems to be limited utility.

I haven't looked, in detail, at what citation() does, and whether there 
is scope for modifying this to accept and format arbitrary (or 
particular) additional fields; it would be a topic for R-devel if there 
was enough interest here.

An existing alternative is to provide a CITATION file with the 
appropriate information, e.g., with citEntry() accepting argument 
doi="10.17129/B9.bioc.YOUR_PACKAGE".

Martin
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or...{{dropped:2}}