Hi all, Rstudio have released the Tensorflow package for R - https://tensorflow.rstudio.com/tensorflow/ - and we have started incorporating it into some of our genomics packages for the heavy numerical computation. We would ideally like these to be submitted to Bioconductor, but there's a custom line required for Tensorflow installation in that after calling install.packages("tensorflow") then Tensorflow must be installed via tensorflow::install_tensorflow() which would break package testing if tensorflow was simply imported into the R package and wasn't already installed. Is there any way to customise a package installation within Bioconductor to trigger the tensorflow::install_tensorflow() ? As more people use tensorflow / deep learning in genomics I can see this being a problem so it would be good to have a solution in place. Many thanks, Kieran Campbell
[Bioc-devel] Tensorflow support for bioconductor packages
7 messages · Hervé Pagès, Kieran Campbell, Michael Lawrence
Presumably the installation of tensor flow only has to happen once, so you could factor your interface such that it installs tensor flow lazily. Michael On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Kieran Campbell <kieranrcampbell at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, Rstudio have released the Tensorflow package for R - https://tensorflow.rstudio.com/tensorflow/ - and we have started incorporating it into some of our genomics packages for the heavy numerical computation. We would ideally like these to be submitted to Bioconductor, but there's a custom line required for Tensorflow installation in that after calling install.packages("tensorflow") then Tensorflow must be installed via tensorflow::install_tensorflow() which would break package testing if tensorflow was simply imported into the R package and wasn't already installed. Is there any way to customise a package installation within Bioconductor to trigger the tensorflow::install_tensorflow() ? As more people use tensorflow / deep learning in genomics I can see this being a problem so it would be good to have a solution in place. Many thanks, Kieran Campbell
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Hi Kieran,
Note that you can execute arbitrary code at load time by defining
an .onLoad() hook in your package. So you *could* put something
like this in your package:
.onUnload <- function(libpath)
{
if (!reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow"))
tensorflow::install_tensorflow()
}
However, having things being automatically downloaded/installed
on the user machine at package load-time is not a good idea. There
are just too many things that can go wrong.
For example, I just tried to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow()
on my laptop (Ubuntu 16.04) and was successful only after the 3rd
attempt (I had to make some changes/adjustments to my system between
each attempt). And Debian Linux is probably the easiest target!
Also note that install.packages() tries to load the package at the
end of the installation when installing from source so if the
.onUnload() hook fails, install.packages() considers that
the installation of the package failed and it removes it.
Finally note that this installation needs to download hundreds of
Mb of Python stuff.
So this is probably the reasons why the authors of the tensorflow
CRAN package chose to separate installation of the tensorflow Python
module from the installation of the package itself. There are plenty
of good reasons for doing that.
What I would suggest instead is that you start your vignette with a
note reminding the user to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() if
s/he didn't already do it. As a side note: I couldn't find a way to
programmatically figure out whether the tensorflow Python module is
already installed in the man page for tensorflow::install_tensorflow(),
I had to dig in the source code of the unit tests to find
reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow")).
In addition, you could also start each of your functions that rely on
the tensorflow Python module with a check to see whether the module is
available, and fail gracefully (with an informative error message) if
it's not.
We'll figure out a way to install the tensorflow Python module on our
build machines.
Hope this helps,
H.
On 03/28/2018 09:23 AM, Kieran Campbell wrote:
Hi all, Rstudio have released the Tensorflow package for R - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tensorflow.rstudio.com_tensorflow_&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=AchAIWmKzcnyw9VXJ7eH5M4dqnTAS0SACVMigCPusHk&e= - and we have started incorporating it into some of our genomics packages for the heavy numerical computation. We would ideally like these to be submitted to Bioconductor, but there's a custom line required for Tensorflow installation in that after calling install.packages("tensorflow") then Tensorflow must be installed via tensorflow::install_tensorflow() which would break package testing if tensorflow was simply imported into the R package and wasn't already installed. Is there any way to customise a package installation within Bioconductor to trigger the tensorflow::install_tensorflow() ? As more people use tensorflow / deep learning in genomics I can see this being a problem so it would be good to have a solution in place. Many thanks, Kieran Campbell
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=RS0haeXXw_GuGbzVJJuh_ZJKHuYhliDfLjtojgmqKFc&e=
Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319
On 03/28/2018 02:41 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:
Hi Kieran,
Note that you can execute arbitrary code at load time by defining
an .onLoad() hook in your package. So you *could* put something
like this in your package:
? .onUnload <- function(libpath)
? {
??? if (!reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow"))
??????? tensorflow::install_tensorflow()
? }
should be .onLoad() in the above code more below...
However, having things being automatically downloaded/installed on the user machine at package load-time is not a good idea. There are just too many things that can go wrong. For example, I just tried to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() on my laptop (Ubuntu 16.04) and was successful only after the 3rd attempt (I had to make some changes/adjustments to my system between each attempt). And Debian Linux is probably the easiest target! Also note that install.packages() tries to load the package at the end of the installation when installing from source so if the .onUnload() hook fails, install.packages() considers that
^^^^^^^^^^^
.onLoad()
same here, sorry
H.
the installation of the package failed and it removes it.
Finally note that this installation needs to download hundreds of
Mb of Python stuff.
So this is probably the reasons why the authors of the tensorflow
CRAN package chose to separate installation of the tensorflow Python
module from the installation of the package itself. There are plenty
of good reasons for doing that.
What I would suggest instead is that you start your vignette with a
note reminding the user to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() if
s/he didn't already do it. As a side note: I couldn't find a way to
programmatically figure out whether the tensorflow Python module is
already installed in the man page for tensorflow::install_tensorflow(),
I had to dig in the source code of the unit tests to find
reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow")).
In addition, you could also start each of your functions that rely on
the tensorflow Python module with a check to see whether the module is
available, and fail gracefully (with an informative error message) if
it's not.
We'll figure out a way to install the tensorflow Python module on our
build machines.
Hope this helps,
H.
On 03/28/2018 09:23 AM, Kieran Campbell wrote:
Hi all, Rstudio have released the Tensorflow package for R - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tensorflow.rstudio.com_tensorflow_&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=AchAIWmKzcnyw9VXJ7eH5M4dqnTAS0SACVMigCPusHk&e= - and we have started incorporating it into some of our genomics packages for the heavy numerical computation. We would ideally like these to be submitted to Bioconductor, but there's a custom line required for Tensorflow installation in that after calling install.packages("tensorflow") then Tensorflow must be installed via tensorflow::install_tensorflow() which would break package testing if tensorflow was simply imported into the R package and wasn't already installed. Is there any way to customise a package installation within Bioconductor to trigger the tensorflow::install_tensorflow() ? As more people use tensorflow / deep learning in genomics I can see this being a problem so it would be good to have a solution in place. Many thanks, Kieran Campbell
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=RS0haeXXw_GuGbzVJJuh_ZJKHuYhliDfLjtojgmqKFc&e=
Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319
Hi Herv?, Michael, Thanks for your feedback. I will add in the reticulate check to ensure tensorflow is installed prior to running and appropriate sections in the vignettes. We have one package essentially ready for submission to bioc, so is the best route forward to submit now or wait until tensorflow is installed on the build servers? Many thanks Kieran
On 28 March 2018 at 15:10, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote:
On 03/28/2018 02:41 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:
Hi Kieran,
Note that you can execute arbitrary code at load time by defining
an .onLoad() hook in your package. So you *could* put something
like this in your package:
.onUnload <- function(libpath)
{
if (!reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow"))
tensorflow::install_tensorflow()
}
should be .onLoad() in the above code more below...
However, having things being automatically downloaded/installed on the user machine at package load-time is not a good idea. There are just too many things that can go wrong. For example, I just tried to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() on my laptop (Ubuntu 16.04) and was successful only after the 3rd attempt (I had to make some changes/adjustments to my system between each attempt). And Debian Linux is probably the easiest target! Also note that install.packages() tries to load the package at the end of the installation when installing from source so if the .onUnload() hook fails, install.packages() considers that
^^^^^^^^^^^ .onLoad() same here, sorry H.
the installation of the package failed and it removes it.
Finally note that this installation needs to download hundreds of
Mb of Python stuff.
So this is probably the reasons why the authors of the tensorflow
CRAN package chose to separate installation of the tensorflow Python
module from the installation of the package itself. There are plenty
of good reasons for doing that.
What I would suggest instead is that you start your vignette with a
note reminding the user to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() if
s/he didn't already do it. As a side note: I couldn't find a way to
programmatically figure out whether the tensorflow Python module is
already installed in the man page for tensorflow::install_tensorflow(),
I had to dig in the source code of the unit tests to find
reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow")).
In addition, you could also start each of your functions that rely on
the tensorflow Python module with a check to see whether the module is
available, and fail gracefully (with an informative error message) if
it's not.
We'll figure out a way to install the tensorflow Python module on our
build machines.
Hope this helps,
H.
On 03/28/2018 09:23 AM, Kieran Campbell wrote:
Hi all, Rstudio have released the Tensorflow package for R - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tensorflow.rstudio.com_tensorflow_&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=AchAIWmKzcnyw9VXJ7eH5M4dqnTAS0SACVMigCPusHk&e= - and we have started incorporating it into some of our genomics packages for the heavy numerical computation. We would ideally like these to be submitted to Bioconductor, but there's a custom line required for Tensorflow installation in that after calling install.packages("tensorflow") then Tensorflow must be installed via tensorflow::install_tensorflow() which would break package testing if tensorflow was simply imported into the R package and wasn't already installed. Is there any way to customise a package installation within Bioconductor to trigger the tensorflow::install_tensorflow() ? As more people use tensorflow / deep learning in genomics I can see this being a problem so it would be good to have a solution in place. Many thanks, Kieran Campbell
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=RS0haeXXw_GuGbzVJJuh_ZJKHuYhliDfLjtojgmqKFc&e=
-- Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319
The problem with requiring explicit tensor flow installation is that it is tantamount to a system dependency in many ways, and those are annoying. Herve points out the problems with installing at load time. My suggestion was to install the package the first time someone tries to e.g. load an R matrix into a tensor. That way, you know that examples and vignettes will always just work (if the installation works) on any build machine, without any admin intervention. And, the last thing a user wants when running an example is an error, even if that error is easily remedied. One downside is that the user could have just forgotten to point the package to a system installation of tensorflow, in which case they will be cursing themselves for forgetting while watching the installation process. You could check for interactive() and then prompt the user to avoid that case. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Kieran Campbell
<kieranrcampbell at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Herv?, Michael, Thanks for your feedback. I will add in the reticulate check to ensure tensorflow is installed prior to running and appropriate sections in the vignettes. We have one package essentially ready for submission to bioc, so is the best route forward to submit now or wait until tensorflow is installed on the build servers? Many thanks Kieran On 28 March 2018 at 15:10, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote:
On 03/28/2018 02:41 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:
Hi Kieran,
Note that you can execute arbitrary code at load time by defining
an .onLoad() hook in your package. So you *could* put something
like this in your package:
.onUnload <- function(libpath)
{
if (!reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow"))
tensorflow::install_tensorflow()
}
should be .onLoad() in the above code more below...
However, having things being automatically downloaded/installed on the user machine at package load-time is not a good idea. There are just too many things that can go wrong. For example, I just tried to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() on my laptop (Ubuntu 16.04) and was successful only after the 3rd attempt (I had to make some changes/adjustments to my system between each attempt). And Debian Linux is probably the easiest target! Also note that install.packages() tries to load the package at the end of the installation when installing from source so if the .onUnload() hook fails, install.packages() considers that
^^^^^^^^^^^ .onLoad() same here, sorry H.
the installation of the package failed and it removes it.
Finally note that this installation needs to download hundreds of
Mb of Python stuff.
So this is probably the reasons why the authors of the tensorflow
CRAN package chose to separate installation of the tensorflow Python
module from the installation of the package itself. There are plenty
of good reasons for doing that.
What I would suggest instead is that you start your vignette with a
note reminding the user to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() if
s/he didn't already do it. As a side note: I couldn't find a way to
programmatically figure out whether the tensorflow Python module is
already installed in the man page for tensorflow::install_tensorflow(),
I had to dig in the source code of the unit tests to find
reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow")).
In addition, you could also start each of your functions that rely on
the tensorflow Python module with a check to see whether the module is
available, and fail gracefully (with an informative error message) if
it's not.
We'll figure out a way to install the tensorflow Python module on our
build machines.
Hope this helps,
H.
On 03/28/2018 09:23 AM, Kieran Campbell wrote:
Hi all, Rstudio have released the Tensorflow package for R - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tensorflow.rstudio.com_tensorflow_&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=AchAIWmKzcnyw9VXJ7eH5M4dqnTAS0SACVMigCPusHk&e= - and we have started incorporating it into some of our genomics packages for the heavy numerical computation. We would ideally like these to be submitted to Bioconductor, but there's a custom line required for Tensorflow installation in that after calling install.packages("tensorflow") then Tensorflow must be installed via tensorflow::install_tensorflow() which would break package testing if tensorflow was simply imported into the R package and wasn't already installed. Is there any way to customise a package installation within Bioconductor to trigger the tensorflow::install_tensorflow() ? As more people use tensorflow / deep learning in genomics I can see this being a problem so it would be good to have a solution in place. Many thanks, Kieran Campbell
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=RS0haeXXw_GuGbzVJJuh_ZJKHuYhliDfLjtojgmqKFc&e=
-- Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
1 day later
FWIW the tensorflow authors didn't opt for automatic lazy installation:
> run_example("hello.R")
Error: Installation of TensorFlow not found.
Python environments searched for 'tensorflow' package:
/usr/bin/python2.7
/usr/bin/python3.5
You can install TensorFlow using the install_tensorflow() function.
Would be interesting to know why.
install_tensorflow() has various arguments and the chances that it
will just work and do the right thing when called with no argument
are low. There is also this 'restart_session' argument that is TRUE
by default and will only work within RStudio. This suggests that after
successful completion R needs to be restarted before the tensorflow
package becomes operational. I didn't test that but that's something
you might want to investigate before opting for lazy installation.
Also it might help to look at how the handful of CRAN packages that
depend on tensorflow handle this. These packages are listed in the
reverse dependencies section of the tensorflow landing page:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tensorflow/index.html
We'll install the tensorflow Python module on the build machines when
you submit your package.
Cheers,
H.
On 03/29/2018 10:08 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
The problem with requiring explicit tensor flow installation is that it is tantamount to a system dependency in many ways, and those are annoying. Herve points out the problems with installing at load time. My suggestion was to install the package the first time someone tries to e.g. load an R matrix into a tensor. That way, you know that examples and vignettes will always just work (if the installation works) on any build machine, without any admin intervention. And, the last thing a user wants when running an example is an error, even if that error is easily remedied. One downside is that the user could have just forgotten to point the package to a system installation of tensorflow, in which case they will be cursing themselves for forgetting while watching the installation process. You could check for interactive() and then prompt the user to avoid that case. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Kieran Campbell <kieranrcampbell at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Herv?, Michael, Thanks for your feedback. I will add in the reticulate check to ensure tensorflow is installed prior to running and appropriate sections in the vignettes. We have one package essentially ready for submission to bioc, so is the best route forward to submit now or wait until tensorflow is installed on the build servers? Many thanks Kieran On 28 March 2018 at 15:10, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote:
On 03/28/2018 02:41 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:
Hi Kieran,
Note that you can execute arbitrary code at load time by defining
an .onLoad() hook in your package. So you *could* put something
like this in your package:
.onUnload <- function(libpath)
{
if (!reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow"))
tensorflow::install_tensorflow()
}
should be .onLoad() in the above code more below...
However, having things being automatically downloaded/installed on the user machine at package load-time is not a good idea. There are just too many things that can go wrong. For example, I just tried to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() on my laptop (Ubuntu 16.04) and was successful only after the 3rd attempt (I had to make some changes/adjustments to my system between each attempt). And Debian Linux is probably the easiest target! Also note that install.packages() tries to load the package at the end of the installation when installing from source so if the .onUnload() hook fails, install.packages() considers that
^^^^^^^^^^^
.onLoad()
same here, sorry
H.
the installation of the package failed and it removes it.
Finally note that this installation needs to download hundreds of
Mb of Python stuff.
So this is probably the reasons why the authors of the tensorflow
CRAN package chose to separate installation of the tensorflow Python
module from the installation of the package itself. There are plenty
of good reasons for doing that.
What I would suggest instead is that you start your vignette with a
note reminding the user to run tensorflow::install_tensorflow() if
s/he didn't already do it. As a side note: I couldn't find a way to
programmatically figure out whether the tensorflow Python module is
already installed in the man page for tensorflow::install_tensorflow(),
I had to dig in the source code of the unit tests to find
reticulate::py_module_available("tensorflow")).
In addition, you could also start each of your functions that rely on
the tensorflow Python module with a check to see whether the module is
available, and fail gracefully (with an informative error message) if
it's not.
We'll figure out a way to install the tensorflow Python module on our
build machines.
Hope this helps,
H.
On 03/28/2018 09:23 AM, Kieran Campbell wrote:
Hi all, Rstudio have released the Tensorflow package for R - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tensorflow.rstudio.com_tensorflow_&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=AchAIWmKzcnyw9VXJ7eH5M4dqnTAS0SACVMigCPusHk&e= - and we have started incorporating it into some of our genomics packages for the heavy numerical computation. We would ideally like these to be submitted to Bioconductor, but there's a custom line required for Tensorflow installation in that after calling install.packages("tensorflow") then Tensorflow must be installed via tensorflow::install_tensorflow() which would break package testing if tensorflow was simply imported into the R package and wasn't already installed. Is there any way to customise a package installation within Bioconductor to trigger the tensorflow::install_tensorflow() ? As more people use tensorflow / deep learning in genomics I can see this being a problem so it would be good to have a solution in place. Many thanks, Kieran Campbell
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=w2p-VnxwECq9u90RNv_B6yCOpXxDkcIPAjcgcpbEeBE&s=RS0haeXXw_GuGbzVJJuh_ZJKHuYhliDfLjtojgmqKFc&e=
-- Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwIFaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=iD4abHBudtzYigKg0eNX5QVxmhh0RZPjBBrpANdFGQ8&s=No86q-9EDOZuiaxQTq-j13aPbFqQ65GTPwonDnTV2Jw&e=
Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319