Skip to content

[Bioc-devel] How much does it takes for a package to appear at Bioconductor.org after a push?

5 messages · Martin Morgan, Arman Shahrisa, Shepherd, Lori

#
Hi, how much does it take for a package to appear at Bioconductoe.org
after pushing changes. I pushed changes after fixing a few bugs
around 32 hours ago. But I still see the previous version of my package.
Package check also shows successful system check for the previous
Version.

Best regards,
Arman
#
It looks like that the new version is gradually appearing.
The first sign just appeared at citation section.
It was waiting for me to send an e-mail!

Best regards,
Arman

From: Arman Shahrisa<mailto:shahrisa.arman at hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 23:27
To: bioc-devel<mailto:bioc-devel at r-project.org>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] How much does it takes for a package to appear at Bioconductor.org after a push?


Hi, how much does it take for a package to appear at Bioconductoe.org
after pushing changes. I pushed changes after fixing a few bugs
around 32 hours ago. But I still see the previous version of my package.
Package check also shows successful system check for the previous
Version.

Best regards,
Arman



_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
#
How come you guys are so secretive about what package you're talking 
about? ;)

Check the 'nightly' builds to see that your package has been built.

   http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.7/bioc-LATEST/

Note that the nightly builds do sometimes fail, so check the date at the 
top center of the page, and the date of your package snapshot. And be 
sure that you're pushing to devel and checking devel availability, or 
similar for release.

I guess you're talking about cbaf. The Monday build report indicates 
that the last commit incorporated in the build was on 2017-11-10 
17:00:16 -0500. Is that before or after the commit you're interested in? 
cbaf built successfully on Linux (so should be available as a 'source' 
tar ball) but not Windows or Mac (Windows is problematic at the moment, 
for the reasons described in 
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2017-November/012340.html )

Clicking on 'cbaf' in the build report takes one to the devel landing 
page, where cbaf version 1.1.1 is available (also via biocLite).

Similar reasoning applies to the release branch, with the report at

   http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.6/bioc-LATEST/

Martin
On 11/13/2017 02:57 PM, Arman Shahrisa wrote:
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or...{{dropped:2}}
#
I apologize. It was better to mention the package name. Thank you very

Much for your assistance.



The devel branch of cbaf has the version of 1.1.1 . The error happened for

Windows and Linux check is caused by the genefilter package. The error for

genefilter package Itself is caused by two unavailable CRAN packages.

So, there is nothing I can do about it.



At the stable 3.6 branch, cbaf 1.0.1 had a few minor issues

(not problematic though), so I decided to fix. I had pushed 1.0.1

exactly 24 hours before pushing 1.0.2, and I pushed 1.0.2 about 32

hours ago. The citation part of the previous presion (cbaf 1.0.1)

was changed to 1.0.2 about thirty minutes ago, so I guess server

is checking the new version right now.





Best regards,

Arman
#
It normally can take up to 24 hrs to appear on the build report after pushing changes depending on when the changes were pushed. We pull changes once a day and propagate to the landing page only if there was a version bump and successful build.


Lori Shepherd

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263