Good day,
So, is the ultimate solution to manually change everything to the format of
\item{\code{show(x)}:}{
...
} ?
The warnings persist, so it does not seem as though R will revert to allowing the currently-popular syntax past its check.
--------------------------------------
Dario Strbenac
University of Sydney
Camperdown NSW 2050
Australia
[Bioc-devel] S4 Methods Documentation Convention Triggers Warnings
4 messages · Dario Strbenac, Hervé Pagès, Deepayan Sarkar
On 27/01/2023 02:00, Dario Strbenac via Bioc-devel wrote:
Good day,
So, is the ultimate solution to manually change everything to the format of
\item{\code{show(x)}:}{
...
} ?
I think I will do this in my own packages. Still need to make those changes though, just didn't have time to work on a script to automate this.
The warnings persist, so it does not seem as though R will revert to allowing the currently-popular syntax past its check.
I don't see that anybody complained about this on R-devel, so they don't really have a reason to revert. H.
-------------------------------------- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com
1 day later
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:26 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages.on.github at gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/01/2023 02:00, Dario Strbenac via Bioc-devel wrote:
Good day,
So, is the ultimate solution to manually change everything to the format of
\item{\code{show(x)}:}{
...
} ?
I think I will do this in my own packages. Still need to make those changes though, just didn't have time to work on a script to automate this.
The warnings persist, so it does not seem as though R will revert to allowing the currently-popular syntax past its check.
I don't see that anybody complained about this on R-devel, so they don't really have a reason to revert.
I'm open to suppressing the warning for \describe items (the warning is more important for \arguments). Let me know. Best, -Deepayan
H.
-------------------------------------- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
-- Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
1 day later
On 28/01/2023 19:42, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
...
I'm open to suppressing the warning for \describe items (the warning is more important for \arguments). Let me know.
Hi Deepayan, suppressing the warning for \describe would kind of make sense. Thanks for the offer. Best, H.
Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com