Title is a bit of a misnomer as this wouldn't be specific to RBGL, just
the way the package was checked in.
Looking at:
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/bioc/1.8/html/RBGL.html
On the vignette listing, it is picking up every single graph rendering as
a vignette (it looks like they're all checked in - why I'm not sure, but
they are). I'm not sure how that table is being generated but would it be
better to key off of the <pkg>/Meta/vignette.rds file?
Perhaps this is actually desired behavior but it seems odd to me.
-J
[Bioc-devel] RBGL's page
5 messages · Jeff Gentry, Vincent Carey, Seth Falcon +1 more
the pdfs were not supposed to be checked in. they should be removed soon. --- Vince Carey, PhD Assoc. Prof Med (Biostatistics) Harvard Medical School Channing Laboratory - ph 6175252265 fa 6177311541 181 Longwood Ave Boston MA 02115 USA stvjc at channing.harvard.edu
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Jeff Gentry wrote:
Title is a bit of a misnomer as this wouldn't be specific to RBGL, just the way the package was checked in. Looking at: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/bioc/1.8/html/RBGL.html On the vignette listing, it is picking up every single graph rendering as a vignette (it looks like they're all checked in - why I'm not sure, but they are). I'm not sure how that table is being generated but would it be better to key off of the <pkg>/Meta/vignette.rds file? Perhaps this is actually desired behavior but it seems odd to me. -J
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Hi Jeff,
On 20 Dec 2005, jgentry at jimmy.harvard.edu wrote:
Title is a bit of a misnomer as this wouldn't be specific to RBGL, just the way the package was checked in.
I'm not sure I understand what you are commenting on with respect to 'Title'.
Looking at: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/bioc/1.8/html/RBGL.html On the vignette listing, it is picking up every single graph rendering as a vignette (it looks like they're all checked in - why I'm not sure, but they are). I'm not sure how that table is being generated but would it be better to key off of the <pkg>/Meta/vignette.rds file?
Technical detail: You only have Meta/ after install. Ideally, we want to build the repository data without requiring an install. It is painful enough as it is to gather together all of the meta data :-/
Perhaps this is actually desired behavior but it seems odd to me.
Well, at present, we are being quite naive and including all pdf files that live in inst/doc. This has obvious disadvantages. On the other hand, it gives some motivation to have clean svn check-ins and such. In the case of RBGL, a number of pdf files were accidentally checked in. + seth
Hi, The generated .pdf/.eps files are removed from svn now. Let me know if questions/problems Thanks Li
Title is a bit of a misnomer as this wouldn't be specific to RBGL, just the way the package was checked in. Looking at: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/bioc/1.8/html/RBGL.html On the vignette listing, it is picking up every single graph rendering as a vignette (it looks like they're all checked in - why I'm not sure, but they are). I'm not sure how that table is being generated but would it be better to key off of the <pkg>/Meta/vignette.rds file? Perhaps this is actually desired behavior but it seems odd to me. -J
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
I'm not sure I understand what you are commenting on with respect to 'Title'.
Sorry - I meant my email title (as in the problem wasn't necessarily specific to RBGL)
I'm not sure, but they are). I'm not sure how that table is being generated but would it be better to key off of the <pkg>/Meta/vignette.rds file?
Technical detail: You only have Meta/ after install. Ideally, we want to build the repository data without requiring an install. It is painful enough as it is to gather together all of the meta data :-/
Yeah, I suspected that. One could look to see what the *.Rnw files are and then look at *.pdf based on that. But really, that's probably too much effort for what amounts to a small amount of confusion in rare cases.
hand, it gives some motivation to have clean svn check-ins and such.
Yup. Thanks -J