Hello, Some users have noticed that the package I maintain, shinyepico, presents a problem caused by incompatibility with the new dplyr/tidyr package versions. I have fixed it and updated it in both the release and the devel branches. However, the build fails because a suggested package, mCSEA, is not available. Is it possible to skip the checking of suggested packages, or should I wait for the dependencies to be fixed? Best regards, Octavio.
[Bioc-devel] Issue updating package
3 messages · Octavio Morante Palacios, Shepherd, Lori, Alvaro Cuadros
It appears to only be a windows ERROR. We will not skip checking so you must wait for the package maintainer to fix mCSEA. I would highly suggest reaching out to the listed maintainer to encourage them to investigate and fix the ERROR. Lori Shepherd - Kern Bioconductor Core Team Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Elm & Carlton Streets Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of Octavio Morante Palacios <octaviompa at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2022 4:45 AM
To: bioc-devel <bioc-devel at r-project.org>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Issue updating package
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2022 4:45 AM
To: bioc-devel <bioc-devel at r-project.org>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Issue updating package
Hello,
Some users have noticed that the package I maintain, shinyepico, presents a
problem caused by incompatibility with the new dplyr/tidyr package
versions.
I have fixed it and updated it in both the release and the devel branches.
However, the build fails because a suggested package, mCSEA, is not
available.
Is it possible to skip the checking of suggested packages, or should I wait
for the dependencies to be fixed?
Best regards,
Octavio.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1K4jWFGgPNnJbu5AtR-PKA5WrIQi_rJWJ3rcjyyk-by8ws736UAuf9tEMGh5L2oqhieO8jxRQoNUh1PgHqtDTkO4BPtiv12g4zP_IfpI7Pp1Pph9dROb3XPZ4tzp9M8XLK9kbLbzl6Yj8aIw71MjSmqksnlu5KrNlXMvcQ0UO0Bh0VtfpxWqnvL_XfJ0kDu4klg6B-ze2-MKM_zPf-FFsg_egDcUoVaw1hCdzaVy7e_MHW7hXFhRpt1WBPAdGdhzlRaAoJWILouTZovz0elq9nkyPjKCsVfD579gGzdipLg0jcgkZztCe2hVmKctFlPUj/https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fbioc-devel
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:45:36AM +0200, Octavio Morante Palacios wrote:
[...]
I have fixed it and updated it in both the release and the devel branches. However, the build fails because a suggested package, mCSEA, is not available.
It seems to me that the error is on Bioconductor side due to the package "backports" which is missing in palomino3 [1]. You'll see this broken dependency chain in Bioc 3.15 check reports: shinyepico -> mcSEA -> Gviz -> biovizBase -> backports I don't see anything wrong in the `backports` report [2] on CRAN. [1] http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.15/bioc-LATEST/palomino3-R-instpkgs.html [2] https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_backports.html Bests, ?lvaro