R/S indexing difference

Wed, Feb 5, 2003 12:48 PM

Is this intentional?

R:

[1] -4  2 -6  4  5  6  7

so NAs are treated as FALSE

S+6.1:

Warning messages:
  Replacement length not a multiple of number of elements to
	replace in: x[c(1, NA, 3)] <-  - (4:6)

[1] -4  2 -5  4  5  6  7

and NAs are ignored.

Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

R/S indexing difference

Thread (3 messages)