Skip to content
Prev 6092 / 63468 Next

RFC: type conversion in read.table

Just a small remark.  I would prefer `NA' to "auto" (or "unknown").  May
be too late to change this now :-)

I would also be happier if we did not refer to the variables explicitly
as `columns'.  (This sounds a bit stupid from the person who wrote
write.table and introduced arguments `row.names' and `col.names'.
Although, at least one of these was modelled after an existing
function).  E.g. something like

	read.table(......, caseNames, varNames, varClasses, .....)

would be nice ...

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._