Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710271814060.15370@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Date: 2007-10-28T06:54:58Z
From: Brian Ripley
Subject: meaning of "trim" in mean()
In-Reply-To: <4720993C.5030105@biostat.ku.dk>
There is only one _range_ mentioned, (0, 0.5). I don't see how you can
construe 'that range' to be a reference to anything other than (0, 0.5).
And why do you suppose the description for argument 'trim' is referring to
'values' of a different argument?
It is telling you what happens for values of trim < 0 or > 0.5: that is
not information that it is appropriate to excise.
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Liaw, Andy wrote:
>> (I see this in both R-patched r43124 and R-devel r43233.)
>> In the Argument section of ?mean:
>>
>> trim the fraction (0 to 0.5) of observations to be trimmed from each
>> end of x before the mean is computed. Values outside that range are
>> taken as the nearest endpoint.
>>
>> Then in the Value section:
>>
>> If trim is non-zero, a symmetrically trimmed mean is computed with a
>> fraction of trim observations deleted from each end before the mean is
>> computed.
>>
>> The description in "trim" to me sounds like Windsorizing, rather than
>> trimming. Should that be edited?
>>
>>
> I think so:
>
>> x <- sort(rnorm(10))
>> mean(x,trim=.1)
> [1] -0.6387413
>> mean(x[2:9])
> [1] -0.6387413
>> mean(x[c(2,2:9,9)]) # Winsorizing
> [1] -0.6204222
>
> So yes, it is trimming, not Winsorizing, and the last sentence in the
> description of "trim" is misleading and should be, well..., trimmed.
>
>
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595