Skip to content
Prev 2458 / 63424 Next

cbind is not generic as claimed, omits labels where S has them (PR#240)

On 5 Aug 1999, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:

            
Sorry, but always the docs are right and the implementation wrong.
That's an axiom of professional computer programming (so I am told
by several ex-professional computer programmers.)
Really? Or try a bit less hard?  Getting the common cases right is not
too hard -- ts.union etc seem normally to be about right, and they have
simple code.
That's OK, as I can coerce a data frame to a ts, but in general I want to
cbind ts objects with non-trivial time bases.

I don't think documenting what we have is a good way out here....