Message-ID: <CAAyVsXKpOTw9kg=EEJ6=tu4WOhMWhQ0nyeXenK690wLgKsOi9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2014-08-15T20:47:40Z
From: Axel Urbiz
Subject: Package manual Tex file
In-Reply-To: <53EDE19B.4060500@gmail.com>
Hi Duncan,
Thanks for your response.
The command "R CMD Rd2pdf --no-clean fooPackage" is creating the pdf file
with the package manual but not the .tex file. I find this odd given that
the following is part of the log:
"Hmm ... looks like a package
Converting Rd files to LaTeX .
Creating pdf output from LaTeX ...
(/Users/package manual/.Rd2pdf14087/Rd2.tex
LaTeX2e <2009/09/24>"
I don't see the .Rd2pdf14087 folder (Note also that I'm on Mac OS and I set
the options to see all hidden files).
Alternatively, the command below successfully creates the .tex file for me.
However, I wonder if there is a way to do this for all .Rd files at once
(including the DESCRIPTION file).
R CMD Rdconv -o fooFUN.tex --type=latex fooFUN.Rd
Thanks again for your help,
Axel.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 14/08/2014, 8:51 PM, Axel Urbiz wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > My apologies if the question is ambiguous.
> >
> > I can create the pdf manual from a package I've built from "R CMD check
> > fooPackage". Is there a way to get the Tex file for the package manual
> pdf?
> > Well, I presume there is Tex code "behind" a package manual pdf file. But
> > if so, how can I get it?
> >
> > I'm on Mac OS.
>
> In the shell, run
>
> R CMD Rd2pdf --no-clean fooPackage
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]