Strange formatting
Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
The spacing is to print all elements in the same field width, and 10 wouldn't look good in a field of with 2. I don't think that could be much different (compare 1:100 and 1:99). The labels would seem to be generated to make room for the label with the longest possible width, which is slightly botched since that width need not be used by any of the labels. Submit a patch?
Believe it or not, this was deliberate for consistency with Splus 3.X. Ross
Ross Ihaka Email: ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz Department of Statistics Phone: (64-9) 373-7599 x 5054 University of Auckland Fax: (64-9) 373-7018 Private Bag 92019, Auckland New Zealand -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._