Message-ID: <x27jv0ldu6.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
Date: 2004-05-25T17:41:17Z
From: Peter Dalgaard
Subject: binary R for Fedora Core 2 e tcl
In-Reply-To: <1085497467.7195.120.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz@medanalytics.com> writes:
> I think that Martyn's consideration of waiting on a FC2 RPM for R 1.9.1
> is reasonable, since that would be an official R release with the FC2
> related fixes. Otherwise, it becomes to an extent, an arbitrary
> decision as to which R patched tarball to use as the basis for a R
> 1.9.0.X FC2 RPM. That could complicate support.
I suppose the right way to do it is to take the official R-1.9.0.tgz
and put the relevant patch set in the spec file. Wouldn't worry too
much about support since Martyn's version is effectively the official
one. However, with 1.9.1 less than a month into the future, there's
not much point in messing with it now.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907