binary R for Fedora Core 2 e tcl
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 10:35, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz@medanalytics.com> writes:
I think that Martyn's consideration of waiting on a FC2 RPM for R 1.9.1 is reasonable, since that would be an official R release with the FC2 related fixes. Otherwise, it becomes to an extent, an arbitrary decision as to which R patched tarball to use as the basis for a R 1.9.0.X FC2 RPM. That could complicate support.
I suppose the right way to do it is to take the official R-1.9.0.tgz and put the relevant patch set in the spec file. Wouldn't worry too much about support since Martyn's version is effectively the official one. However, with 1.9.1 less than a month into the future, there's not much point in messing with it now.
True on all accounts. Marc