Skip to content
Prev 46376 / 63424 Next

format bug and patch

On 8/16/13, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I sent this message to Duncan only.
Re-sending this again to the list. Sorry...

My interpretation of digits=1 was that I want both real and imaginary
parts to have 1 significant digits.

Consider this command, no digits parameter this time:
[1] "0e+00+2.1e+16i"

I do not see a reason not to output the number as it was entered.

If it is not a bug, it should be documented. I'll check if I can help with that.

-- Aleksey