diag() has a bug (PR#13702)
in that case, wouldn't diag(diag(foo)) suffice? b
On May 14, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Michael Spiegel wrote:
The intent of diag(foo, 2, 2) was to return a matrix that is a 2 x 2 matrix which contains only the diagonal entries of the matrix foo. I can't do diag(foo) because this returns a vector. I could reach my goal with matrix(diag(foo), nrow = nrow(foo), ncol = ncol(foo)). If this is not a reasonable thing for diag(<matrix>, <numeric>, <numeric>) to return, then at the very least the error message should be changed, as the first argument is in fact a matrix. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Benilton Carvalho <bcarvalh at jhsph.edu> wrote: My understanding is that providing nrow and ncol, you want to create a diagonal matrix with those dimensions. diag(pi, 6, 6) and that by diag(foo, 2, 2) you really meant diag(foo)[2] Apologies if I misunderstood. b On May 14, 2009, at 10:45 AM, michael.m.spiegel at gmail.com wrote: Full_Name: Michael Spiegel Version: 2.9.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (204.111.252.142) The diag() function appears to reject the first argument when it is a matrix, and nrow and ncol arguments are also provided. foo <- matrix(c(1:4),2,2) foo [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 3 [2,] 2 4 diag(foo) [1] 1 4 diag(foo, 2, 2) Error in diag(foo, 2, 2) : first argument is array, but not matrix. is.matrix(foo) [1] TRUE
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel