Skip to content
Prev 1066 / 63424 Next

"`R notes' should be better"

Actually, I am very much undecided on this.  Of course, we do have all
the help pages for on-line reading, but the question is whether they
contain everything one needs.  If someone wants to know what to do with
lists, for example, looking up the help page for list() and then perhaps
going through subscripting etc will be a little complicated.

Or, suppose someone eventually sat down and carefully explained what
expressions, names, ... are.  

To put it differently, the on-line thing I am looking for would NOT have
a lot of math in it.

As an aside, there is the additional issue that if someone writes R code
and quickly wants to look up the exact syntax of a function, it may be
great if one could do that without firing up R.

And yes, cut&paste would be great in a structured introduction.  But
this could also be in HTML obtained via latex2html/hyperlatex, so no
need for using Texinfo just for this purpose.
Sounds great.
We could have a package `doc' subdirectory, and install its contents to
some place in the `doc' tree.

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._