Skip to content
Prev 61237 / 63424 Next

rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

Thank you for your answer.
In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned. But I cannot imagine this costs so much time just for that...

A deeper analysis of time spent seems to point that a large time was mainly spent on testthat and Rcpp dependencies compilation... But other recent packages depending on these also are not spending so much time.

CRAN team, as I failed to reproduce the issue with rhub dockers, 
- is there any reason that could explain that fedora-*-devel is so slow for this package or compilation of Rcpp/testthat ?
- is our slapack a possible source of... anything ?
- are we the only package which embeds "standard armadillo" and tries to deal with simple precision lapack issues on fedora ?
- is there any chance that I can get a deeper log of what happened ?

Best regards,

Yann

-----Message d'origine-----
De?: Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> 
Envoy??: mardi 10 janvier 2023 11:41
??: RICHET Yann <yann.richet at irsn.fr>; R-devel at r-project.org
Cc?: Pascal Hav? <pascal at haveneer.com>
Objet?: Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

Le 10/01/2023 ? 11:37, Serguei Sokol a ?crit?:
Oops, it was 10 threads not 30 but it does not change the nature of a possible issue.
--
Serguei Sokol
Ingenieur de recherche INRAE

Cellule Math?matiques
TBI, INSA/INRAE UMR 792, INSA/CNRS UMR 5504
135 Avenue de Rangueil
31077 Toulouse Cedex 04

tel: +33 5 61 55 98 49
email: sokol at insa-toulouse.fr
http://www.toulouse-biotechnology-institute.fr/en/technology_platforms/mathematics-cell.html