Interpretation of escaped characters in \examples{}
At 05:22 AM 26/05/2003, Kurt Hornik wrote:
Gordon Smyth writes:
I've noticed a curious interpretation of escaped characters in \examples{}
in .Rd files.
For example, if I type
files <- dir(pattern="\\.txt")
at the R prompt, I will get a vector containing all file names in the current directory containing the string ".txt". If I put
\examples{ files <- dir(pattern="\\.txt") }
in an .Rd file of a package, then the generated documentation will replace my command with
Examples
files <- dir(pattern="\.txt")
i.e., the escaped backslash has been interpreted into a single
backlash. If
a user types example(myfun) at the R prompt, where myfun is the topic
alias
of the .Rd file, then they will actually get
files <- dir(pattern=".txt")
i.e., the backslash is interpreted a second time.
This seems an undesirable feature. What is in the .Rd file, what is
displayed in the online help, and what is generated by example() are
all different commands. I had expected anything in \examples{} to be
reproduced in the online help and by \example{} entirely literally
with no intepretation.
I am using R 1.7.0pat under Windows 2000 Professional.
R-exts clearly says
The "comment" and "control" characters `%' and `\' _always_
need to be escaped. Inside the verbatim-like commands (`\code'
and `\examples'), no other(1) characters are special. Note that
`\file' is *not* a verbatim-like command.
-k
Dear Kurt,
Thanks very much for this reference from the R-exts document. You don't
address though the main point of my post, which is that the code displayed
the online help and executed and checked by R CMD check is different from
the code extracted and executed by the function 'example'.
Suppose I have an .Rd file for a function 'readFiles' containing the text
'\examples{dir(pattern="\\\\.txt")}'. The quadruple-backlash will ensure
that 'help' displays and R CMD checks the correct command
'dir(pattern="\\.txt")'. However, if a user types 'example("readFiles")' at
the R prompt, the command that R will execute is 'dir(pattern=".txt")'.
This is *different command* and will generally give *wrong* results. There
is no way that I can see to ensure that R CMD check and 'example' execute
the same code.
My concern here is the with actual behavior of R rather than what R-exts
says but, since you are emphasising the clarity of the R-exts document, it
may be worth pointing out that R-exts also says
\examples{...}
Examples of how to use the function. These are set verbatim in
typewriter font.
This seems to say that \examples{} is a verbatim environment rather than
merely verbatim-like. This statement comes 4 pages earlier in the pdf
version than the paragraph you quote.
Best wishes
Gordon