matrixStats: Extend to arrays too (Was: Re: Suggestion: Adding quick rowMin and rowMax functions to base package)

For consistency with rowSums colSums rowMeans etc., the names should be
? ? ? ?colMins colMaxs
? ? ? ?rowMins rowMaxs
This is also consistent with S+.

You mean rowMaxes, right?  Or is the rule to add an s, not to pluralise?

I think if you were writing a new package, you'd be better off a whole
new naming convention that extended better to higher dimensions.

Hadley

Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/