Skip to content
Back to formatted view

Raw Message

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304251839360.20074-100000@gannet.stats>
Date: 2003-04-25T19:41:16Z
From: Brian Ripley
Subject: Bug in versioned install (was: (fwd) R-1.7.0 : Problem withDownloading  "dse") (PR#2827)
In-Reply-To: <3EA96B07.40405@bank-banque-canada.ca>

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote:

> Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> > A patch for install.packages() can be loaded as
> > 
> >  
> > source("http://www.maths.lth.se/help/R/patches/rw1070/install.packages.R
> > ")
> > 
> > All fixes are done to the local function unpackPkg() of
> > install.packages(). The fix is based on the assumption that a bundle (in
> > zip format) contains directories for packages  , which in turn contains
> > the DESCRIPTION files needed. Is this assumption correct?! I also made
> 
> When I put the bundle together, the bundle directory contains a 
> DESCRIPTION file, and each package subdirectory contains a file
> DESCRIPTION.in. At some point the DESCRIPTION and DESCRIPTION.in files 
> are cat'ed together in each package directory (but not by me). So, the 
> assumption may be correct at some point in the process, put it is not 
> correct at the beginning.

It is true of a binary INSTALL of a bundle, the issue here.

However, this bug is supposed to be already fixed in R-patched, I believe.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595