Skip to content
Prev 35882 / 63424 Next

Copyright versus Licenses

Dominick Samperi a ?crit :
If someone writes some code in a file, he is entitled to be the 
copyright owner of what he wrote. Kicking him away means not using his 
changes.
Nope. You cannot "cancel" your rights. You have them. Full stop.

You just give enough rights to other fellows. And restrictions when it 
comes to distributing GPL stuff. Essentially.

You are not taking your rights away from and giving them to others. That 
doesn't make sense.
Nope. GPL allows you to make commercial GPL products. So you cannot say 
that it forbids turning GPL work into a commercial product.

And there are cases where ISP have been 'distributing' GPL code in the 
routers, ADSL boxes. They've been sued for not disclosing the source 
code. They haven't been sued for shipping GPL code in these ADSL boxes 
in the scope of a commercial contract. Quite the opposite.
It is designed to protect people receiving software from vendors who may 
want to conceal the source code of what they're distributing. Among 
other things.

But, for instance, if your code may be hijacked by a big corporation, 
putting it under the GPL is a guarantee that it doesn't make huge sense 
to hijack it. So here you protect the author.

But how is this R related?

All the best,