RE^2: [Rd] New generic functions in "R base" {was `truncate'}
From: Martin Maechler [mailto:maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 11:30 AM
To: gregory_r_warnes@groton.pfizer.com
Subject: RE^2: [Rd] New generic functions in "R base" {was `truncate'}
[...]
Apropos ci() : There's the very generally useful confint() function in MASS. Since MASS will become one of the recommended packages `real soon now', I doubt that we'd want yet another one in `base'. Or do you have reasons to prefer your ci() over V&R's confint() ? If so, it may make quite some sense discussing that on R-devel.. Regards, Martin
Actually, I wasn't aware of the confint() function in MASS. My ci() function doesn't have any particular advantage. Actually, this illustrates a problem and raises another issue. As it turns out, I'm not the only one to have (unnecessarily) re-implemented the features of confint() because it didn't occur to me to look in MASS for it. I'm sure that others have had the same thing happen. Shouldn't such generally useful functions get moved into base or some other package that is on the default search path? -Greg LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._