Skip to content
Prev 44588 / 63424 Next

Comments in the DESCRIPTION file

On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:36 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:

            
DCF itself doesn't define the meaning of # -- it only defines that no field name is allowed to start with #. In fact the same document says that lines starting with # are not permitted in general DCF files -- they are only permitted in Debian's source package control files. That leaves the status of # as comments somewhat confusing. My interpretation would be that generic DCF doesn't allow # but specific formats derived from DCF may choose to interpret it that way. In either case the current behavior of read.dcf() definitely satisfies the DCF definition. As both Brian and Bill pointed out, the proper way to do that is to define a data field with data/value as the comment.

Cheers,
Simon