Skip to content
Prev 14184 / 63424 Next

barplot manpage (PR#7331)

Yup, I think you're right.  R is a volunteer project, so what needs to 
happen to improve the documentation is that some capable volunteers (or 
just one volunteer) step forward.   It is the prerogative of the members of 
R-core to decide whether to spend their time on improving documentation or 
improving the functionality (or merely having a life).

However it is worth noting that R does have really quite good documentation 
for a piece of software of its kind, compared to both other open source and 
commercial software.

What would need to be improved in the document "An Introduction to R", 
specifically, the subsubsection on "Graphical Elements" (under "Graphics 
Parameters List" in "Graphical Procedures", p 77 in my copy) in order that 
it would meet the criterion of being "less formal man pages"?  There's a 
lot to be said for having the "less formal" documentation being organized 
around concepts rather than specific functions (as the man pages are), 
because the conceptual organization allows more organized discussion of how 
functions work together and which are the appropriate functions to 
accomplish certain types of tasks.

Maybe inserting automatically generated "see also" references to "An 
Introduction to R" into the man pages would help beginners (and those who 
have to deal with cleaning up bug reports that aren't really bugs)?

-- Tony Plate
At Tuesday 12:52 AM 11/2/2004, Dan Bolser wrote: