Rcmd check fails on Windows Samba network path in R 2.9.1
See r-devel thread '[Rd] file.access() on network (mounted) drive on Windows Vista' on Nov 26, 2008: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e5/devel/08/11/0806.html where it was concluded that file.access() is "not 100%", e.g. file.access() and file.info() can give different answers. I added fileAccess(..., safe=TRUE) to R.utils, which imitates file.access() but relies also on file.info() and file.exists() to infer the rights. It is still not 100% but (hopefully) closer than file.access(). /H On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Kevin R.
Coombes<krcoombes at mdacc.tmc.edu> wrote:
Hi, The problem almost certainly has something to do with Samba. ?We also have a NetApp file system, and copying the package source to that drive and running Rcmd check from Windows works just fine. When running the commands from an interactive R session, file_test returns TRUE and file.access to test write permission indicates a failure, even though that information is incorrect.Here is a session transcript: -----------------------------------------
getwd()
[1] "n:/krc/Umpire/R-Package"
lib <- "Umpire.Rcheck"
file_test("-d", lib)
[1] TRUE
file.access(lib, 2)
Umpire.Rcheck ? ? ? ? ?-1
dir.create(paste(lib, "testdir", sep='/')) dir(lib)
[1] "00check.log" ? "00install.out" "testdir" ? ? > sessionInfo() R version 2.9.1 (2009-06-26) i386-pc-mingw32 locale: LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 attached base packages: [1] stats ? ? graphics ?grDevices utils ? ? datasets ?methods ? base ---------------------------------------- Again, this all worked (and still works) correctly in 2.8.1. ? Kevin Tony Plate wrote:
This error message looks like it comes from src/library/tools/R/install.R,
which contains the following test:
? if (!.file_test("-d", lib) || file.access(lib, 2L))
? ? ? stop("ERROR: no permission to install to directory ",
? ? ? ? ? ?sQuote(lib), call. = FALSE)
The function .file_test() is defined earlier in the same file (it looks at
file.info(lib)$isdir) and appears to be intended to be the same as
utils:::file_test().
You could start trying to figure out what the problem is by trying these
calls on the directory in question from an interactive R session.
(They seem to work as intended on my Windows system with a NetApp file
system mounted on a letter drive.)
-- Tony Plate
Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
Hi, I have just updated R from version 2.8.1 to version 2.9.1. ?I am running Windows XP Professional, Service Pack 3. With the update, I decided to update a set of packages that I maintain by compiling them for the new version. ?Everything worked fine except for one package. ?This package is unique (among the six I was working on) in that is stored on a UNIX-based file server that is exported to the Windows network via Samba. ?The root of that network path is mapped to drive "N:" on the local machine. 'Rcmd check' fails for this package under 2.9.1. ?The error message in '00install.out' ?is: "Error: ERROR: no permission to install to directory 'N:/krc/Umpire/R-Package/Umpire.Rcheck'" 'Rcmd check' works for this package under 2.8.1. 'Rcmd check' works for this package if the directory is copied onto a local hard drive instead of the network drive. 'Rcmd build' and 'Rcmd build --binary' work under both versions. It would be nice if someone could figure out what has changed and fix it.... Best, ? Kevin Coombes
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel