Skip to content
Prev 10022 / 63421 Next

Strategies for S-PLUS compatibility?

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

            
This depends a lot on what `S-PLUS' is (Unix/Windows, 3.4/4.x/2000/5.x/6.x
are all different).  My best shot is to refer to `S Programming' about
constructing a package under the appropriate S-PLUS section.

If it's a recent version of S-PLUS, you should convert the help files to
Ssgm with Rdconv rename .R files to .q and uses a single-level
directory structure.  Beyond that it is a matter of experience and
trial-and-error: if C is involved it is essential to have header files
declaring (correctly) all entry points used.