Skip to content
Prev 16747 / 63424 Next

symbol.For problem? (PR#7974)

jbremson at neyman.ucdavis.edu wrote:
I don't see why you think this should have worked. symbol.For shows you 
how the name would be translated between the function name and the name 
that .Fortran looks for in the load table.  It looks like you're asking 
for the translation to be done twice.

Is this documented somewhere as something that should work?

Duncan Murdoch