Message-ID: <wncn2ee24db.fsf@fhat.stat.sc.edu>
Date: 1998-03-25T15:10:24Z
From: A.J. Rossini
Subject: R alpha/beta naming
In-Reply-To: Peter Dalgaard BSA's message of "25 Mar 1998 11:32:13 +0100"
Until we get 1.0, I don't understand what the alpha/beta designations
mean. I.e. from one view, it's beta, since the interface is
reasonably solid, and just some fixes need to be done. Then one could
consider that a whole new module will show up (implying alpha-status).
I think that stable/unstable would be better labels.
best,
-tony
---
Anthony Rossini
Manifold Graphics / Epimetrics
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._