long-standing documentation bug in ?anova.lme

Ben Bolker 
    on Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:32:20 -0500 writes:

    > tl;dr anova.lme() claims to provide sums of squares, but it doesn't. And
    > some names are misspelled in ?lme.  I can submit all this stuff as a bug
    > report if that's preferred.

    > ?anova.lme says:

    > When only one fitted model object is present, a data frame with
    > the sums of squares, numerator degrees of freedom, denominator
    > degrees of freedom, F-values, and P-values

    > The output of

    > fm1 <- lme(distance ~ age, data = Orthodont) # random is ~ age
    > anova(fm1)

    > gives columns

    > numDF denDF   F-value p-value

    > -- i.e. the sums of squares aren't there!  (For fairly good reasons; lme
    > doesn't actually compute them internally, and it might not always be
    > straightforward to compute them, for more complex models. They would
    > mostly be useful for comparison with simpler, method-of-moments based
    > approaches like aov()). Federico Calboli pointed this out on r-help in
    > 2004: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2004-May/051444.html

    > Two more points:

    > * the last sentence of the Description might need one fewer comma
    > [after "statistic"] or one more [after "p-value"].
    > * in ?lme, Littell's name is misspelled at least twice and Reinsel's
    > at least once.

We'd be grateful for patches, thank you Ben!

Notably for 'nlme' and 'foreign', both of which are maintained
by R-core (rather than individual R core or R Foundation
members) we've also encouraged that  R's bugzilla be used for
non-trivial bug reports as that allows attached patches and
simple references too. 

    > Is there a publicly accessible SVN server for recommended packages (in
    > general) and nlme (in particular) anywhere?

nlme's SVN is physically at the same place as the R sources
(here at ETH Zurich), with URL

   https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/nlme

in addition to 'nlme', at least  'foreign', 'mgcv'  and
'cluster' are also maintained there.

Thank you for the question:
 I do think "we" should add the corresponding  svn URL to the
 respective DESCRIPTION file.

OTOH, 'Matrix' has moved to R-forge a while ago .. and I'm
currently also not sure about the other Recommended packages
such as 'KernSmooth' or 'boot' . 

Best,
Martin

Martin Maechler
ETH Zurich and R core team