Accuracy (PR#13999)
witkovsky wrote:
Full_Name: Viktor Witkovsky
Version: 2.9.2
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (78.98.89.227)
Hello,
I have found strange behavior of the function qchisq (the non-central
qchisq is
based on inversion of pchisq, which is further based on pgamma). The
function
gives wrong results without any warning. For example:
qchisq(1e-12,1,8.94^2,lower.tail=FALSE) gives 255.1840972465858 (notice
that
here the correct value should be 255.1841334848075),
but
qchisq(1e-12,1,8.95^2,lower.tail=FALSE) gives 1249.681320136836
Here, the correct value should be 255.5037231613135.
So, it seems that qchisq is inaccurate for small probability values and
larger
non/centrality parameter.
I am using the precompiled binary version of R, under Windows XP.
_
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
os mingw32
system i386, mingw32
status
major 2
minor 9.2
year 2009
month 08
day 24
svn rev 49384
language R
version.string R version 2.9.2 (2009-08-24)
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
More entertainingly (and perhaps enlighteningly?)
curve(qchisq(1e-12,1,x^2,lower.tail=FALSE),from=0.1,to=50)
Of course, I haven't taken the time to dig through and see what's happening :-(
sessionInfo()
R version 2.9.2 (2009-08-24) i486-pc-linux-gnu locale: LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8;LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8;LC_MONETARY=C;LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8;LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets grid methods [8] base other attached packages: [1] reshape_0.8.3 plyr_0.1.9 proto_0.3-8 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] ggplot2_0.8.4
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Accuracy-%28PR-13999%29-tp25843737p25845807.html Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.