Skip to content
Prev 45981 / 63424 Next

R-3.0.1 - "transient" make check failure in splines-EX.r

Thank you very much, Paul.

Serendipitously, I seem to have stumbled on a solution. In my parallel (still unsuccessful) attempt to build a BLAS for a 64bit machine (see <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2013-May/066731.html>) I remembered from ATLAS that under the newer Windows there is a divergence from the "standard" ABI (see <http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/atlas_install/node57.html>).

Looking through the various makefiles under OpenBLAS, I found the following:

		ifeq ($(C_COMPILER), GCC)
		#Test for supporting MS_ABI
		GCCVERSIONGTEQ4 := $(shell expr `$(CC) -dumpversion | cut -f1 -d.` \>= 4)
		GCCVERSIONGT4 := $(shell expr `$(CC) -dumpversion | cut -f1 -d.` \> 4)
		GCCMINORVERSIONGTEQ7 := $(shell expr `$(CC) -dumpversion | cut -f2 -d.` \>= 7)
		ifeq ($(GCCVERSIONGT4), 1)
		# GCC Majar version > 4
		# It is compatible with MSVC ABI. 
		CCOMMON_OPT	+= -DMS_ABI
		endif
		
I had been building OPBL using gcc4.8.0, which is ostensibly "compatible" with the newer ABI, but Rtools still lives in 4.6.3, which isn't. Recompiling the BLAS with MinGW32 for 4.6.3 created a file that has passed `make check-all` twice now. I plan on comparing the speed with the ATLAS-based blas, and if it is faster, I hope to e-mail the dll and check results to Dr. Ligges.

I say "stumbled serendipitously" because when using the 64 bit version of MinGw 4.6.3 resulted in the same `optim`-based error in `factanal` which I describe in the thread linked-to above. I will try using different versions of MinGW or even trying under Cygwin, I guess.

In any event, Paul, I am curious if when you were trying to compile and had the same issue, were you using a different version or generation of gcc in the BLAS compilation than in the R compilation?

Once again, thank you very much.

Avraham Adler


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:26 AM
To: Adler, Avraham
Subject: Re: R-3.0.1 - "transient" make check failure in splines-EX.r

Avraham

I resolved this only by switching to a different BLAS on the 32 bit machine.Since no one else seemed to be having problems, I considered it possible that there was a hardware issue on my old 32 bit machine. The R check test failed somewhat randomly, but often. most disconcertingly, it failed because it gives different answers. If you source the code in an R session a few times you have no trouble reproducing this. It gives the impression of an improperly zeroed matrix.

(All this from memory, I'm on the road.)

Paul
On 13-05-28 06:36 PM, Adler, Avraham wrote: