Skip to content
Prev 33155 / 63424 Next

active bindings and ls.str

On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Romain Francois wrote:
Yes, that's around half the reason. The other half is our data.frame-editor, 
which tries to create the illusion of "in-place" editing. For that it's pretty 
important to keep the editor data in sync with R's version of the data.frame.

I would certainly like to see an easier way to detect changed objects as well.
Yes, passing the symbol does the trick, indeed. (And until a few minutes ago, 
there was a regression in RKWard in just that respect.) 

I'll have to admit that we do play with the internals of promises in RKWard, 
too: When the only reason that we forced a promise was that the object browser 
stepped on it, we "put it back" to free up the memory, again. This works 
remarkably well, but in fact I don't think we are supposed to do this...

Regards
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20090630/55e9d278/attachment.bin>