Skip to content
Prev 38609 / 63424 Next

possible bug in chron packages

Dear,

According to the documentation, the parameters given in "dates" are
passed to the function "chron". When trying this out, it turns out
that this apparently doesn't happen, eg:
[1] 01/01/10
[1] 01 Jan 2010

I would expect the outcome of both functions to be the same, or am I
overlooking something?

Kind regards
Joris