Skip to content
Prev 15375 / 63424 Next

unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic fonts. 
My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the same way as the 
others: can you track down where it is coming from?

Otherwise my list on FC3 is the same as yours (minus the duplicates, which 
are also puzzling).  I have also just checked Exceed, which has the same 
list plus scalable fonts (and also has

-adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-sun-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-sun-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-75-75-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-75-75-p-0-sun-fontspecific

which caused problems for 2.0.1 with getting bold symbols in some sizes, 
hence the second bug fix I mentioned).

As a wild guess, do you have a font server as well as local fonts?

Brian
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: